Can an Asteroid Really Destroy Earth in 800 Years?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Razi Abid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroids Rocks Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential threat of asteroids to Earth, specifically addressing the possibility of an asteroid impacting the planet in approximately 800 years. Participants explore historical impacts, current monitoring efforts, and speculative predictions regarding asteroid trajectories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern about the possibility of an asteroid impacting Earth in the future, referencing movies and popular culture.
  • Others note that a specific asteroid threat was deemed unlikely after astronomers recalculated its orbit, suggesting that while large impacts have occurred historically, they are rare.
  • A participant recalls the excitement surrounding the Shoemaker-Levy comet collision with Jupiter, implying that significant impacts are not uncommon in the solar system.
  • There is skepticism about predictions made by Nostradamus regarding comets, with some participants dismissing such interpretations as unfounded.
  • One participant discusses the ongoing efforts to identify Near Earth Objects (NEOs) and Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs), highlighting that initial predictions often change as more data becomes available.
  • Another participant raises questions about the accuracy of long-term predictions for asteroid trajectories, citing the complexities involved in calculating cumulative perturbations over centuries.
  • A detailed mathematical analysis is presented regarding the potential impact energy of an asteroid, including calculations based on its size and speed, suggesting that a significant impact could have catastrophic consequences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the likelihood of an asteroid impacting Earth in 800 years. While some express confidence in current monitoring efforts, others question the reliability of long-term predictions and the potential for undiscovered threats.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the reliability of astronomical predictions and the limitations of current observational capabilities. There is also a recognition that many historical impacts are not indicative of future threats.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in asteroid impact risks, astronomical monitoring, and the historical context of celestial collisions may find this discussion relevant.

Razi Abid
I have seen many movies relating to the destruction of the Earth from space rocks and asteroids. Sometimes I think our planet might be attacked by such things. Even more I heard that scientist have observed an asteroid heading to Earth and might crash after about 800 years. Can this ever happen?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That particular danger evaporated after astonomers recalculated the orbit. But sure, big rocks - way big - can and have hit the earth. It pretty well settled that the dinosaurs were done in by a comet or asteroid crash some 65 million year ago. And the modern theory of the moon's formation is based on the Earth getting a big whack from a near planet sized object back in the early formation days.

Can it happen in our time? Yes, but not very likely. The big guys are few and far between, and every one that did crash in the past is one that will never do that again. Obviously the whole two million years or so of homo sapiens has not been interrupted by a big crash.
 
Jupiter is a big enough target that major impacts are probably pretty common. I am old enough to remember the excitement generated among astronomers by the comet Shoemaker-Levy hitting Jupiter. Big comet, big planet, big collision.
 
people who interpret nostradamus are foolish. Did you follow the big flap about the King of Terrors that was supposed to come down on us in July 1999?
 
SelfAdjoint, I missed that one I guess. I do remember that about a decade ago a Korean sect prepared for Christ's Second Coming, prophesied to be on some certain day, by among other things aborting pregnancies. That had to be Pat Robertson's ultimate nightmare.
 
There are several dedicated searches underway to identify any threats from NEOs, PHAs, etc (Near Earth Objects, Potentially Hazardous Asteroids). This site is a good one for keeping track of news, searches, results and so on.

As SelfAdjoint noted, every now and then a NEO is observed with a preliminary orbit that has a low, but non-zero, probability of intersecting the Earth sometime in the next millenium. Subsequent work - in the next week or two - to refine the orbit has always reduced those probabilities to zero.

The post-discovery work is basically of two kinds - more observations, with more telescopes in different locations; and searches of old astronomical plates (before CCDs made them extinct, almost all astronomical images were made on glass plates covered in special photographic emulsion) and images. Often these searches will find 'pre-covery' images of the NEO, allowing a better orbit to be calculated. With the increasing availability of vast amounts of historical astronomical data via the internet, anyone with a broadband connection can do this research! Yes, even any PF member!

Well over 90% of all NEOs and PHAs will likely be identified in the next decade. Will we then be able to breath easy? No, because there's a class of potential homo sap (and all complex life on Earth) killers we aren't ever likely to identify - (new) comets.
 
Razi Abid said:
I have seen many movies relating to the destruction of the Earth from space rocks and asteroids. Sometimes I think our planet might be attacked by such things. Even more I heard that scientist have observed an asteroid heading to Earth and might crash after about 800 years. Can this ever happen?
800 years!? I'd like to know how anybody can accurately predict the cumulative perturbations of an Earth-crossing asteroid across that much time...accurately enough to predict a collision or a miss with Earth, that is.

I remember that JPL had to do a probability distribution for a 2001 XU encounter, and that wasn't anywhere near eight centuries. (2001 XU is an asteroid in an 8:33 tidal resonance with Earth, with a closest possible approach - for now - of 19,000 kilometers.)

An asteroid with an absolute magnitude (solar system scale) of 22.0 and a (typical) surface albedo of 0.13 will be about 150 meters in diameter. A difference of one magnitude corresponds to an increase or decrease in reflected power by the fifth root of 100, or 2.511886431.

For example, 2001-XU has an absolute magnitude of 19.01, and therefore...

Reflected power = 100^{(22-19.01)/5} = 15.7

...as compared to the reflected power from a 150-meter asteroid.

Reflected power varies according to surface area, which depends on the square of the average radius. So 2001-XU is about 3.96 times as wide as a 150-meter asteroid is. Its average radius is about 297 meters.

If we pretend that the asteroid is spherical, then the volume is 110 million cubic meters.

If we assume that the average density is 3000 kilograms per cubic meter (typical for rock), the mass is about 330 billion kilograms. (No attempt at precision is being made here; this is just a ballpark calculation.)

Here's an equation that I put together to let you reach the impact energy directly.

K = 1.26 megatons TNT { 100^[0.3 (22-MAG)] } V^2

Where K is kinetic energy, MAG is the asteroid's absolute magnitude, and V is the asteroid's speed relative to Earth at impact, in kilometers per second.

The equation implicitly assumes that the asteroid reflects 13% of incident sunlight. You would discover the relative speed by reducing the orbital elements for Earth and for the asteroid to obtain the velocity vectors of each at the moment of impact, viz...

*** top of velocity calculation section ***

a : semimajor axis of the orbit
e : eccentricity of the orbit

1 astronomical unit = 1.49597870691E+11 meters

GMsun = 1.32712440018E+20 m^3 sec^-2

The canonical velocity in a hyperbolic orbit, in general, is found from

Vx’’’ = -(a/r) { GMsun / a }^0.5 sinh u

Vy’’’ = +(a/r) { GMsun / a }^0.5 (e^2 - 1)^0.5 cosh u

Vz’’’ = 0

Where u is the eccentric anomaly and r is the current distance from the sun.

The canonical velocity in an elliptical orbit, in general, is found from

Vx’’’ = -sin Q { GMsun / [ a (1-e^2) ] }^0.5

Vy’’’ = (e + cos Q) { GMsun / [ a (1-e^2) ] }^0.5

Vz’’’ = 0

Where Q is the true anomaly.

The triple-primed vectors would be rotated (negatively) by the angular elements of the orbit (w,i,L) to heliocentric ecliptic coordinates.

Rotation by the argument of the perihelion, w.

Vx'' = Vx''' cos w - Vy''' sin w

Vy'' = Vx''' sin w + Vy''' cos w

Vz'' = Vz''' = 0

Rotation by the inclination, i.

Vx' = Vx''

Vy' = Vy'' cos i

Vz' = Vy'' sin i

Rotation by the longitude of ascending node, L.

Vx = Vx' cos L - Vy' sin L

Vy = Vx' sin L + Vy' cos L

Vz = Vz'

The unprimed vector [Vx, Vy, Vz] is the velocity in the orbit, referred to heliocentric ecliptic coordinates.

*** end of velocity calculation section ***

The impact speed will be the magnitude of the vector difference between the HEC velocity of the asteroid and the HEC velocity of the Earth.

If 2001-XU ever hits Earth, it will be moving at 28.9 km/sec, which corresponds to an impact energy of 2.76+20 Joules, which is equivalent to 65,600 megatons TNT (or 65.6 gigatons). This kind of thing might, possibly, you know, destroy the world.

Modeling asteroid impact effects.
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/

Asteroid orbital elements.
http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sb_elem.html
http://arnold.usno.navy.mil/murison/Asteroids/OrbitalElements.html

Jerry Abbott
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K