Taking the derivative of e^3x


by sonofjohn
Tags: derivative
sonofjohn
sonofjohn is offline
#1
Jan11-09, 04:45 PM
P: 76
If f(x) is the function given by f(x) = e3x + 1, at what value of x is the slope of the tangent line to f(x) equal to 2?

I thought the derivative of e3x would be 3e3x because of the chain rule, but it doesn't appear to be correct. I know that ex is just ex, so is e3x just e3x?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs
Free the seed: OSSI nurtures growing plants without patent barriers
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
Dick
Dick is offline
#2
Jan11-09, 04:56 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,170
You were right the first time. You need the chain rule. (e^(3x))'=3*e^(3x).
tiny-tim
tiny-tim is offline
#3
Jan11-09, 04:56 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
tiny-tim's Avatar
P: 26,167
Hi sonofjohn!
Quote Quote by sonofjohn View Post
I thought the derivative of e3x would be 3e3x because of the chain rule, but it doesn't appear to be correct.
It is correct who says it isn't?

sonofjohn
sonofjohn is offline
#4
Jan11-09, 04:58 PM
P: 76

Taking the derivative of e^3x


Ahh thank you very much!
sonofjohn
sonofjohn is offline
#5
Jan11-09, 05:05 PM
P: 76
The region bounded by y = e^x, y = 1, and x = 2 s rotated about the x-axis. The volume of the solid generated is given by the integral_____________.

So this is volume problem and a disc/ washer method formula should work best. I was going to set the problem as:

pi(antider)from 0-2 of (e^x-1)^2(1-1)^2 but I don't believe I will come out with 1-1 and 0 as the volume.
Dick
Dick is offline
#6
Jan11-09, 05:11 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,170
You are rotating around the x-axis. At a given value of x what is the outer and inner radius of the washer?
sonofjohn
sonofjohn is offline
#7
Jan11-09, 05:16 PM
P: 76
0 and 2, so they would be my bounds so would I rather set the problem up as, pi*antiderv*(e^x-1)^2
tiny-tim
tiny-tim is offline
#8
Jan11-09, 05:18 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
tiny-tim's Avatar
P: 26,167
Hi sonofjohn!
Quote Quote by sonofjohn View Post
The region bounded by y = e^x, y = 1, and x = 2 s rotated about the x-axis. The volume of the solid generated is given by the integral_____________.

pi(antider)from 0-2 of (e^x-1)^2(1-1)^2 but I don't believe I will come out with 1-1 and 0 as the volume.
(have a pi: π )

I don't actually understand all of your (e^x-1)^2(1-1)^2

but you have a π(ex - 1)2, which is not the area of anything, is it?
Dick
Dick is offline
#9
Jan11-09, 05:19 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,170
No, at say x=1 what is the inner and outer radius of the washer? What about at a general value of x? 0 and 2 are fine for the limits on the x integration. Now you just want to find the area of the washer. Correctly, this time. It's not pi*(e^x-1)^2.
sonofjohn
sonofjohn is offline
#10
Jan11-09, 05:25 PM
P: 76
Ok so I should find the area of the washer. The area of the washer should be defined as e^x - 1 Also since I am using the dish washer formula, I should square both parts of the integration thus yielding:

pi(anitderivative)(e^2x -1)
Dick
Dick is offline
#11
Jan11-09, 05:29 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,170
Ok. Yes. The area is pi*(outer radius^2-inner radius^2).
sonofjohn
sonofjohn is offline
#12
Jan11-09, 05:32 PM
P: 76
Quote Quote by Dick View Post
Ok. Yes. The area is pi*(outer radius^2-inner radius^2).
Thanks for the clarification!
sonofjohn
sonofjohn is offline
#13
Jan11-09, 06:08 PM
P: 76


The 3rd problem on this page is difficult for me to understand. I don't understand what the x stands for when they are talking about the bounds in terms of integration. Do they mean the x-axis on the graph or possible x = 2 where at the x intercept?
Dick
Dick is offline
#14
Jan11-09, 06:29 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,170
x is a point between 0 and 4. Any one. What you might notice is that G(x) is the area under the curve from 0 to x. H(x) is NEGATIVE of the area under the curve from x to 2 (because the integral is from 2 to x instead of from x to 2). Might this tell you something about G(x)-H(x)?
sonofjohn
sonofjohn is offline
#15
Jan11-09, 06:44 PM
P: 76
So then the answer must be g(x) = h(x) - 2, because h(x) is positive and g(x) is negative. g(x) is also always going to be two less, because it goes from any point to 0, and h(x) only goes to 2.
Dick
Dick is offline
#16
Jan11-09, 06:50 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,170
Quote Quote by sonofjohn View Post
So then the answer must be g(x) = h(x) - 2, because h(x) is positive and g(x) is negative. g(x) is also always going to be two less, because it goes from any point to 0, and h(x) only goes to 2.
I can't really agree with you there, sonofjohn. Try this. What are G(1) and H(1)? Work them out from the picture.
sonofjohn
sonofjohn is offline
#17
Jan11-09, 07:01 PM
P: 76
I see now that (d) cannot work. Subtracting 2 everytime from h will not yield an equal integral. Now I would like to say that g(x) = h(x+2) would work, but it doesn't seem plausible past h(1). Could G'(x) = H'(x+2) work? I don't even understand what it means.
Dick
Dick is offline
#18
Jan11-09, 07:07 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,170
You didn't answer my last question. What are G(1) and H(1)? That should let you eliminate some possibilities.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Taking the derivative of a definite integral Calculus 11
Taking Physical Chemistry before formally taking Quantum Mechanics Academic Guidance 17
replacing total derivative with partial derivative in Griffiths' book Advanced Physics Homework 3
taking derivative Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Taking the derivative Calculus 11