The reversed Cicular Pi !Reversed Circular Pi: A New Math for Geometric Shapes

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shintashi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion introduces the concept of "Reversed Circular Pi," proposing a new mathematical approach to geometric shapes based on sound frequencies and cymatics. The author argues that traditional methods of deriving pi (3.14...) are flawed and suggests that starting with a sphere can simplify the creation of geometric shapes like squares and cubes. This perspective emphasizes the relationship between sound, geometry, and the fundamental nature of shapes, advocating for a shift in mathematical principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cymatics and wave theory
  • Familiarity with basic geometric shapes and their properties
  • Knowledge of traditional mathematical constants, particularly pi
  • Conceptual grasp of sound frequencies and their impact on physical forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of cymatics and their applications in geometry
  • Explore the mathematical properties of spheres and their derivatives
  • Study the implications of sound frequencies in geometric constructions
  • Investigate alternative mathematical systems that challenge traditional constants like pi
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, educators, and anyone interested in innovative approaches to geometry and the intersection of sound and mathematics.

shintashi
Messages
117
Reaction score
1
:smile:

Hi !

I was pondering over the morphology of etymology, and the tonal "Aum" or "OM" of the vedic sanskrit.

If you look at these tones in a cymatic (wave theory) way, you discover some unqiue principles.

All of our time we have spent trying to create pi, 3.14blahblahblahblahblah...

but, why ? Is our math sound ? I say nay.

Within a circle, a tone can create a perfect square, a perfect triangle, etc.

Within a sphere, a tone can create a perfect cube.
These geometric values are derivatives of ONE...

and ONE represents the circle, and the sphere.

The fractional values used to create the square, and the CUBE are whole number ratios !

Thus, wouldn't it be easier, to simply start with sphere, and derive geometric shapes from there, than to do it the opposite way ?

In a slightly more complesx aspect, for those who love complexity, It occurs to me, that we could create a very simple system of math for creating such squares, etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Greetings.

You will want to get to know a member who goes by the name 'WWW,' formerly known as 'Organic.'
 

Similar threads

Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 266)
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K