Thread Closed

proof for k natural numbers

 
Share Thread
Jan19-09, 10:10 PM   #1
 

proof for k natural numbers


Hi, how would you show that 4^(k)+4 * 9^(k) [tex]\equiv[/tex] 0 (mod 5)
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Jan19-09, 11:37 PM   #2
 
Note that 9 is congruent to 4 mod 5.
Jan20-09, 01:23 AM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Checking a few small values of k shows it is not always true.
Jan20-09, 02:55 AM   #4
 

proof for k natural numbers


Quote by robert Ihnot View Post
Checking a few small values of k shows it is not always true.
I'm pretty sure that it is, in fact, always true.
Jan20-09, 07:47 AM   #5
 
Quote by d_leet View Post
I'm pretty sure that it is, in fact, always true.
It is? If we have

[tex] 4^{k+4} \cdot 9^{k} [/tex]

Then letting [tex] k = 0 [/tex] we get

[tex] 4^{0+4} \cdot 9^{0} = 256 [/tex]

That is certainly not 0 mod 5. Next letting [tex] k = 1 [/tex] we get

[tex] 4^{1+4} \cdot 9^{1} = 9216 [/tex]

Also not 0 mod 5?
Jan20-09, 09:02 AM   #6
 
Actually, what he meant was [tex]4^k + 4*9^k \equiv 0 \text{mod} 5[/tex].

Hint. Try induction over [tex]k[/tex]. You may rephrase it to: for every [tex]k \in N[/tex], there's an [tex]n \in N[/tex] such that [tex]4^k + 4*9^k = 5n[/tex].
Jan20-09, 05:23 PM   #7
 
sorry for the typo i corrected it. so if i use induction than its easy for the base case K=0 which gives me 5 congruent 0 mod 5 which is true. Now, wsalem wrote that expression using the relationship a=mn+b with b=0. Now how am I supposed to use induction for k in this case when there is also n present.
Jan20-09, 06:14 PM   #8
 
would really appreciate if someone could help me on this.
Jan20-09, 06:56 PM   #9
 
Define [tex]P(k)[/tex] as the statement: [tex]4^k + 4*9^k = 5n[/tex] for some [tex]n \in N[/tex]

For the inductive step.
Suppose [tex]P(k)[/tex] hold, i.e there is an [tex]n \in N[/tex] such that : [tex]4^k + 4*9^k = 5n[/tex].
Then you need to show that P(k+1) also holds, i.e there is an [tex]m \in N[/tex] such that [tex]4^{k+1} + 4*9^{k+1} = 5m[/tex].
Jan20-09, 07:54 PM   #10
 
i know how induction works but i cant figure out what specific 4^k expression do i have to add/multiply to [tex]
4^{k+1} + 4*9^{k+1} = 5m
[/tex] make it work for m+1.
Jan20-09, 08:09 PM   #11
 
No, you are missing the point of induction here! It is k we want to run induction over, not m, so it is pointless to say "m+1". The existence of a such m is merely for the statement P(k) to hold at a particular case.

Inductive step:
Suppose P(k) holds, then [tex]4^k = 5n - 4*9^k[/tex]
Now [tex]4^{k+1} + 4*9^{k+1} = ....[/tex]

now, for P(k+1) to hold, you must show that [tex]4^{k+1} + 4*9^{k+1} = 5*m[/tex] for some integer m.
Jan20-09, 08:24 PM   #12
 
sorry i didnt mean m+1. What i'm saying is that there is some expression involving k which must be multiplied on either side of the equation. I don't know what that expression is.
Jan20-09, 08:28 PM   #13
 
I gave it to you in the earlier reply. Think harder, it should be quite obvious by now!
Jan20-09, 08:29 PM   #14
 
You know that

[tex] 4^k + 4 \cdot 9^k = 5m, k,m \in \mathbb{Z} [/tex]

Now we want to show that

[tex] 4^{l+1} + 4 \cdot 9^{l+1} = 5n, l, n \in \mathbb{Z} [/tex]

So let's work with our expression

[tex] 4^{l+1} + 4 \cdot 9^{l+1} = 4 \cdot 4^l + 4 \cdot 9 \cdot 9^l = 4 \cdot 4^l + 4 \cdot (4+5) \cdot 9^l = 4 \cdot 4^l + 4^{2} \cdot 9^l + 4 \cdot 5 \cdot 9^l = 4 \left(4^l + 4 \cdot 9^l) + 5 \cdot 4 \cdot 9^l [/tex]

The first part you know is divisible by 5 from the hypothesis, the 2nd part has a factor of 5 so obviously it is too.
Jan20-09, 08:33 PM   #15
 
I think holding the final answer to enable saadsarfraz to reach it would have been much better!
Jan20-09, 08:40 PM   #16
 
NoMoreExams,
Quote by NoMoreExams View Post
You know that
[tex] 4^k + 4 \cdot 9^k = 5k, k \in \mathbb{Z} [/tex]
This is incorrect, it is [tex] 4^k + 4 \cdot 9^k = 5m[/tex] where [tex]k,m \in \mathbb{Z} [/tex]
Jan20-09, 08:41 PM   #17
 
Yes sorry I'll fix it
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: proof for k natural numbers
Thread Forum Replies
Natural Numbers General Math 7
Natural numbers Z? Linear & Abstract Algebra 6
Natural Numbers - Pi, Log, .... General Math 8
Natural numbers [please help] Calculus 4