Ball, spring and curved incline - is this right?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a ball, a spring, and a curved incline. The spring has a coefficient of 10, and the ball weighs 10 grams, compressed by 10 cm. Using the conservation of energy principle, the ball's speed upon leaving the incline at a height of 0.4 meters is calculated to be 1.46 m/s. Both methods of calculation, using potential energy and kinetic energy, yield the same result, confirming the validity of the approaches.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with spring mechanics and Hooke's Law
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and gravitational potential energy
  • Ability to perform calculations involving mass, height, and speed
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hooke's Law and its applications in spring mechanics
  • Explore advanced topics in conservation of energy in physics
  • Learn about projectile motion and its relation to speed and angle
  • Investigate the effects of friction and incline angles on motion
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding energy conservation in motion scenarios.

redshift
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Ball, spring and curved incline -- is this right?

Picture a smooth, level, frictionless surface (A) that leads into a curved incline (B-C). The top of the incline (C) is 0.4 meter above the flat surface. At the start of A is a spring with a spring coefficient of 10, with one end fixed and a ball weighing 10 g placed at the other end (facing the curve). The spring is then compressed by 10 cm. When released, the ball flies into the air from point C. Determine the ball's speed when it leaves C.

I first determined the height the ball reaches, using:
0.5kx^2 = mgh
h = 0.51 m

Then determined the velocity the ball would have if it were dropped from a height of 0.11 meter (that is, the height above point C), so that
v^2 = 2ah
v^2 = 2 (9.8)0.11
v = 1.46 m/s

I'm not sure about the second calculation, because the ball could have been moving at an angle when it left C.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The angle doesn't matter because you are asked for "speed", not "velocity".
This is, as you saw, a question of conservation of energy. The ball starts with the energy given to it by the spring (the same as the work done to compress the spring: 0.5kx2 as you calculated. The maximum height the ball can reach, which you calculate is irrelevant- it's the energy you need.

When the ball is at point C, mgh= (10)(9.8)(4) is the potential energy. Subtract that from the ball's total energy to find the kinetic energy at that point and use
(1/2)mv2 to find the speed.

On second thought your method of finding the highest point and then the speed of a ball dropped from that height to C should give exactly the same answer. Use my method as a check!
 
Yes, i got the same answer. Since this is a conservation of energy problem, obviously your approach is the more elegant of the two. Makes sense: the PE that has been consumed has been converted to speed.
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K