Hang vertically downward are connected by a pulley

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StephenPrivitera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by gravity on two masses connected by a pulley system. Participants explore the dynamics of the system, including forces acting on the masses and the resulting work done over a specified time period. The context includes theoretical reasoning and mathematical derivations related to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a solution for the work done by gravity on the larger mass, leading to a calculated value of 6300J, while noting that the work done on the smaller mass should be equivalent in magnitude.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that the tension in the rope is equivalent to the weight of the smaller mass, arguing that this is incorrect due to the acceleration of the smaller mass.
  • A subsequent reply emphasizes the need to apply Newton's second law to derive the correct tension for each mass, suggesting that the tension does not equal the weight of the smaller mass.
  • One participant attempts to generalize the problem by considering a different setup with frictionless surfaces and a frictionless pulley, leading to a new expression for tension but ultimately arriving at a different work value for the smaller mass.
  • The same participant expresses uncertainty about their calculations, questioning where they might have gone wrong in their reasoning and derivations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the calculations or the assumptions made regarding the forces in the system. Multiple competing views and interpretations of the problem remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of Newton's laws and the derivation of work done, indicating potential limitations in their assumptions and calculations. The discussion reflects the complexity of the problem and the need for careful consideration of forces and motion.

StephenPrivitera
Messages
360
Reaction score
0
Find the work done by gravity when two masses (42kg and 75kg) which hang vertically downward are connected by a pulley. The masses are initially at rest. The mass move under the influence of gravity for 2.0s. Assume no friction in the pulley.

My solution:
Considering the larger mass m1, the work done by gravity on m1 is
W1=w1*d, where W1 is the work done on m1 by gravity, w1 is the force of gravity acting on m1, and d is the distance traversed by m1 in the time period. d is the same for both m1 and m2 (the smaller mass) since both move under the influence of gravity and therefore have the same acceleration. The net force on m1 is the force of gravity on m1 minus the tension of the rope (if downward is to be the positive direction). The tension of the rope is equivalent in magnitude to the weight of m2. Thus, F(net)1=g*(m1-m2)=m1*a. This distance traversed by m1 is then d=g/(2m1)*(m1-m2)(t^2). The work done by gravity on m1 is then
W1=g*m1*g/(2m1)*(m1-m2)(t^2)=(g^2)/2*(m1-m2)(t^2)=6300J
Without calculating, I can see that the work done by gravity on the other mass should be equivalent in magnitude to this answer.

Book's answer: 1.8x10^3J

Where did I go wrong?
Thanks in advance for the help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The tension of the rope is equivalent in magnitude to the weight of m2.
This is obviously wrong, as m2 is accelerating upwards, showing a net resultant force on m2 of m2*a.

Try instead to work out an expression for T for each mass, and equate the Ts to get the acceleration.
 


Hi Stephen, and welcome to PF.

Originally posted by StephenPrivitera
My solution:
Considering the larger mass m1, the work done by gravity on m1 is
W1=w1*d, where W1 is the work done on m1 by gravity, w1 is the force of gravity acting on m1, and d is the distance traversed by m1 in the time period. d is the same for both m1 and m2 (the smaller mass) since both move under the influence of gravity and therefore have the same acceleration. The net force on m1 is the force of gravity on m1 minus the tension of the rope (if downward is to be the positive direction).

OK

The tension of the rope is equivalent in magnitude to the weight of m2.

This is a mistake. Remember that m2 is accelerating[/color], so Newton's 2nd law for m2 reads is:

ΣFy=T-m2g=m2a2.

T does not equal m2g!

Try implementing that correction into your solution and see what you come up with.
 
Thanks for the help. To show you I learned my lesson, I performed this little exercise. Please check my work.
I figured that the problem above was just a specific instance of the general case below (where A1=A2=pi/2). Both masses are on frictionless surfaces. They are attached by a rope which runs along a frictionless pulley. See the attached diagram. I'll show my work briefly (since I'm sure you know much more than I do, this should be very easy to follow).
I figured out that the problem becomes very simple if I treat the rope as if it were straight (and rotate the other forces accordingly). Then I don't have to worry about vector notation using two different coordinate systems. Anyway,
T - m1*g*sin(A1) = m1*a
a = (1/m1)(T-m1*g*sin(A1)) = (1/m2)(m2*g*sin(A2) - T)
T = (m1*m2*g)/(m1 + m2)*(sin(A1) + sin(A2))
When A1=A2=pi/2
T = 2(m1*m2*g)/(m1 + m2)
Thanks again!

...
I was so confident in this result, but it doesn't appear to be right either. Using my work above, I'm still getting 2400J for the work on the smaller mass in the original problem. What am I doing wrong?
W=FgD=m2*g*1/2*(Fnet)/m2*t^2 = g/2*t^2*Fnet
For Fnet I have Fnet = T - m2*g = 2(m1*m2*g)/(m1 + m2) - m2*g
W = 1/2*(tg)^2*m2*[2m1/(m1+m2)-1]
From there it's just plugging in numbers. Where did I go wrong?
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K