Number sequences hard


by Snubb
Tags: number, sequences
Snubb
Snubb is offline
#1
Mar21-09, 06:29 AM
P: 3
Hello All,

Well to make the Story short, I made a little bet in school that I could solve all the number sequences on a site, but now's the joke. I cant

Ye ye , stop laughing But really I can handle myself at numbers normally pretty well, but this seems out of my league

Can anyone solve this ?

-2 3 27 69 129 …


For those interested, this is the site, and was making the hard test ofc.


http://www.fibonicci.com/en/number-sequences



3. The attempt at a solution

It seems to be something like (x^n)-y

help :-)
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs
Free the seed: OSSI nurtures growing plants without patent barriers
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
maze
maze is offline
#2
Mar21-09, 06:48 AM
P: 655
You sure it doesnt start with -5?
Snubb
Snubb is offline
#3
Mar21-09, 06:53 AM
P: 3
yes i am sure it doesnt start with -5 :)

And I already mailed the website, but havent gotten any reply

Have been cracking my brain on it for hours, it isn't funny anymore :(
This is def. one of, if not the hardest test i made on the web lol.

pwned :))

Mark44
Mark44 is offline
#4
Mar21-09, 10:08 AM
Mentor
P: 21,012

Number sequences hard


I went to the site you posted and saw this problem among the hard problems group. The potential answers given are 178, 207, 268, and 312.

I choose 207.

Here's my reasoning:
-2 = the starting number
3 = 22 + (-1)
27 = 52 + 2
69 = 82 + 5
129 = 112 + 8
The pattern here seems to be that the number being squared increases by 3 each time, and the number added to the square also increases by 3 each time.
The next number in the list should be
142 + 11 = 196 + 11 = 207, which just happens to be one of the possible answers.
Snubb
Snubb is offline
#5
Mar21-09, 02:30 PM
P: 3
You're Awesome!

But doesnt taht make the start nuymber -3

(-1^2)-4

^^
Mark44
Mark44 is offline
#6
Mar21-09, 06:39 PM
Mentor
P: 21,012
Well, there's that.

Anyway, -2 = -3 for very small values of -2.
csprof2000
csprof2000 is offline
#7
Mar22-09, 01:09 AM
P: 288
These problems are all sort of dumb.

For each sequence, there are infinitely many rule sets you can generate which will give you any answer you can possibly concoct. With no restrictions on the rules, the game is an exercise in futility.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Cauchy sequences and sequences in general Calculus 7
Number Sequences General Math 10
Really hard number theory problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Number of Sequences Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Complex Number, hard to solve General Math 9