Thread Closed

Did Selberg proved RH ??

 
Share Thread
Apr15-09, 01:14 PM   #1
 

Did Selberg proved RH ??


the idea is that if the Selberg zeta function related to the length of Geodesics becomes

[tex] Z(s+1)= \zeta (s) Z(s) [/tex]

and the Z(s) has all the roots with real part 1/2 would imply that RH is true ?? , sorry i am not an expert but found it curious since Riemann-Weyll trace is almost equal to Selberg trace and it is supposed that using his Selberg Trace we can prove that all the zeros lie on the line Re(s=1/2) , by the way the fucntion multiplying Z(s) is the usual Riemann Zeta function. providing the surface of the laplacian has geodesic with lenght log(p_n) for every prime
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: Did Selberg proved RH ??
Thread Forum Replies
Funcitonal equation for Selberg Zeta Linear & Abstract Algebra 0
Books on Selberg Trace /Noncommutative geometry Science Textbook Discussion 2
Selberg Delange method and Mertens function. Linear & Abstract Algebra 0
Selberg formula for trace. Differential Geometry 1