The kaleidoscope of periodic tables.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 281Oleg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Periodic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around various models and theories related to the periodic table of elements, particularly focusing on concepts like secondary periodicity, cyclicity, and the structural properties of atomic orbitals. Participants explore different approaches to understanding the arrangement and behavior of elements in the periodic table, including a proposed "ball-bearing model of atom." The scope includes theoretical considerations and the implications of these models on the properties of elements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces a "ball-bearing model of atom," suggesting it is more flexible and capable of addressing questions left unanswered by traditional atomic models.
  • Another participant discusses secondary periodicity, linking it to the filling of orbitals and the relative positioning of these orbitals, noting that this phenomenon is more pronounced in later families of elements.
  • Some participants propose that specific properties of element families influence the overall structure of the periodic table, suggesting a connection between different families based on expressed or absent properties.
  • There is mention of cyclicity in the behavior of certain properties, particularly electron affinity, which some argue does not align with the traditional periodic table structure.
  • One participant questions the clarity of another's message, indicating a language barrier or difficulty in understanding the content presented.
  • Another participant expresses a belief that the order of orbital filling is relevant to the discussion of periodicity.
  • There are attempts to simplify complex ideas, with one participant asking for feedback on their clarity and understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the models and theories discussed, with no clear consensus reached. Multiple competing ideas about the structure and behavior of elements in the periodic table remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific definitions of periodicity and cyclicity, which may not be universally accepted. The discussion includes references to external resources that may not be accessible to all participants, potentially limiting the understanding of certain points raised.

281Oleg
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Tools of construction of system of elements.

Tools of construction of system of elements.
www.genevo.org/B.htm[/URL]

An old model of atom does not answer many questions about properties. And... I decided to offer you a new one. It is called "ball-bearing model of atom". It is very flexible and it can be twisted!

[PLAIN]www.genevo.org/F.htm[/URL]




It is logical, that shown cyclicity for d-elements is shown also in other families.

[PLAIN]www.genevo.org/Z1.htm[/URL]


I have tried to simplify last model maximum.

Secondary periodicity see at figure (the schedule of the data).

[PLAIN]www.genevo.org/S.htm[/URL]


In my last work I show secondary periodicity on this property for s-elements on the example of the data on electron affinity. In the same place, on the example of d-elements other logic of the tableis visible, - not periodicity but cyclicity.
Some properties are cyclic and not correspond to the periodic table.
I offer to your attention [PLAIN]http://www.genevo.org/H.htm
It is visible on the schedule that on the property of electron affinity s-elements behave variously before p and d-elements . Before р - elements electron affinity grows, before d-falls.
Even on this property it is possible to speak about available laws which are not clear yet.


Specific properties are inherent in each family of chemical elements.
When constructing the table of periodic specific properties of one element’s family, other families has this property partly (comparably) periodical or as an absent one (is not shown). A parity of families with expressed properties or partly expressed properties or not expressed properties is natural.
Specific properties of element’s families determine the form of the table. All tables are naturally connected.
The continuation of the table of overjumpings of electrons http://www.genevo.org/OD.gif - the table of electrochemical series (fragment). http://www.genevo.org/E.htm
In this periodic table an electrochemical series of potentials of 3d-elements and 5d-elements is very similar. It is shown on the graph. http://www.genevo.org/Ef2.gif And a series of electrochemical potentials of 4d-elements is differing from series of potentials of 3d-elements and 5d-elements. If to turn this series and increase on-1 you see that areas of maxima and minima of this series will coincide with the areas of maxima and minima of electrochemical series of potentials of 3d-elements and 5d-elements. Graph http://www.genevo.org/Ef2.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Secondary periodicity

Secondary periodicity is connected with repeated filling of everyone
orbital by the second electron and with relative positioning of orbitals.
Secondary periodicity is more brightly expressed at last families.

Similarity by orbital structure can be various.
Orbitals may be focused in one direction, thus,
electronic configurations of compared atoms may not coincide.

update www.genevo.org./E.htm[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the page does not open write me please.
 
Îëåã, ÿ íå ïîéìó, ÷òî ïðîèñõîäèò ñ òâîåé òåìîé. Êàê íîâàÿ çàãðóçêà, òàê ñîâåðøåííî äðóãèå çàãîëîâêè è òåêñòû. Ïîæàëóéñòà, äàé ññûëêó íà ðóññêèé âàðèàíò. Ìîæåò áûòü òàê ÿ ñìîãó ïîíÿòü ñîëü òâîåé èäåè.
 
I do not think that I'll decipher your message quickly, though some words may be guessed by quantity of letters, and it is possible to assume it in theory. My mail gourmet@pochta.ru
 
I think it it is connected with order of orbital filling.
 
I think I did it more simple and understandable, how do you think?
 
Tools of construction of system of elements.

www.genevo.org/B.htm[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
17K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
26K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
47K