Gravitational force and the distance from the earth

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster seeks assistance with a problem involving gravitational force and the calculation of altitudes above the Earth's surface where the gravitational field strength is reduced to specific fractions of its surface value. The subject area pertains to gravitational physics and the application of relevant equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the gravitational formula and the rearrangement of equations to find altitudes. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of altitude and the correct application of constants. Some participants express confusion over the calculations and the values obtained.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have provided equations and attempted calculations, while others question the correctness of the values obtained. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final answers, but guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of altitude.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the wording of the question may lead to misunderstandings, particularly regarding the definition of altitude as the distance above the Earth's surface. There is mention of differing values for the Earth's radius and the need for careful unit consideration.

akatsafa
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I really need help with this question. I've been trying to figure it out for a couple of hours.

Find the altitudes above the Earth's surface where Earth's gravitational field strength would be (a) five-sixths and (b) one-sixth of its value at the surface. These units have to be in km.

thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
at the surface accelartion due to gravity is given by:

[tex]g = \frac{GM}{r^2}[/tex]

where r is the radius of the Earth G the universal graviational constant and M the mass of the Earth:

therfore:

[tex]\frac{5g}{6} = \frac{5GM}{6r^2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{g}{6} = \frac{GM}{6r^2}[/tex]

re-arrange the equations, plug in the numbers and the adjust for the correct units.
 
Substitute GM/R^2 in for g and solve for r using jcsd's equations.

What value are you getting?

cookiemonster
 
All you need to do is recognize th the answers to

a)
[tex]\sqrt{\frac{6r^2}{5}}[/tex]

b)
[tex]\sqrt{6r^2}[/tex]

where r is the radisu of the Earth at the surface.
 
Last edited:
Sorry that's cos I missed out the indices!
 
What do you mean by that? are the equations wrong?
 
they are correct now.
 
they haven't changed. are they the same equations you gave me originally?
 
You should be getting answers of roughly:

a) 6979 km

b) 15606 km

the equations are correct.
 
  • #10
these values are not correct either. I submitted them, and the professor said they were not correct.
 
  • #11
jcsd's solutions are correct. If you're using a different value for R, then plug it into the formulas he gave to get whatever answer your professor thinks it's looking for.

cookiemonster
 
  • #12
I think it is just the wording of the question that is gettting the wrong answer not that the answers are wrong. NOte it says altitude, i think altitude means distance above Earth's surface therefore the anwers given for a and b should have the radius of the Earth subtracted from them. Depending on what constants you are using I am getting a around 610km (roughly) if you need sig figs you better do it all i.e. follow the equation and just get an answer, not just subtract from the other answers and for b about 9300km real rough two sig fig calcs
 
  • #13
how are you getting 610km? When I take 6.38e3 from 6.37e3(which is the radius of the Earth in km), I'm not getting that value. I'm getting the values that jcsd got, but how do i get the altitude?
 
  • #14
once i have the radius, how do i find the altitude? taking the Earth's radius minus the radius i found, does not produce what jungle peanut got.
 
  • #15
Lets say you have the same answer as jcsd,
6979km as the radius where the acceleration is 5/6 the acceleration at the surface.
If the surface is at a radius of 6378km then I subtract 6979km from 6378km and get 601km pretty close to my rough answer.
 
  • #16
thank you all for the help! I'm terrible at working physics problems. thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K