Register to reply

Fail blog photos

by Ivan Seeking
Tags: blog, fail, photos
Share this thread:
Andre
#199
Nov3-10, 10:34 AM
PF Gold
Andre's Avatar
P: 5,458
Quote Quote by DaveC426913 View Post
I don't get it.
Mojibake
Borg
#200
Nov9-10, 04:46 AM
PF Gold
Borg's Avatar
P: 760
Really?

Borg
#201
Dec1-10, 05:14 AM
PF Gold
Borg's Avatar
P: 760
And, in the criminals are stupid department...

The legend
#202
Dec1-10, 07:53 AM
P: 423
Wonder-fool security



another one:

Pythagorean
#203
Dec1-10, 08:52 AM
PF Gold
Pythagorean's Avatar
P: 4,262
Impressive:

The address was deciphered by the postal employees and delivered successfully. Some of the correct characters (red) were written above the wrong ones (black).
DaveC426913
#204
Dec1-10, 09:38 AM
DaveC426913's Avatar
P: 15,319
Quote Quote by Borek View Post
Sorry, my mistake - I have edited my original post, first link contains explanation now.

But I am surprised - have you never seen how cyrillic alphabet is displayed when you use incorrect encoding?
I don't get the whole thing. All I see is a package with an address written in an obviously foreign language, then obviously translated character by character into some other foreign language. I don't understand the significance of either language, which one is original, which one is the transcription, nor do I understand what was written by a human versus what was written by a machine, or what emailing has to do with it.


Oh. OK. So:
  1. The original email was written including a snail mail address. The email itself was authored using a Cyrillic character set (the curly ones).
  2. When it arrived in the recipient's Inbox, her mail client output the Cyrillic as Western, which would have it come up in the recipient's email as ǺǑĚ.
  3. The recipient then faithfully copied every incorrect character from her email (having no idea they were now gibberish) onto the package (the bottom set of characters in black on the package).
  4. The red lettering is the back-conversion to the correct character set, done by the posties.
Got it.



"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog. You understand it better, but the frog dies in the process." — E. B. White
Ivan Seeking
#205
Dec2-10, 03:07 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Ivan Seeking's Avatar
P: 12,498

http://thestir.cafemom.com/home_gard...k_snowman_with
HeLiXe
#206
Dec2-10, 06:42 PM
P: 410
Quote Quote by Borg View Post
Really?

Who in their right mind would want to wake a sleeping baby?
mheslep
#207
Dec3-10, 11:47 AM
PF Gold
P: 3,081
Quote Quote by HeLiXe View Post
Who in their right mind would want to wake a sleeping baby?
Those who want the baby to put the baby back to sleep later on a regular schedule.
HeLiXe
#208
Dec3-10, 12:35 PM
P: 410
Quote Quote by mheslep View Post
Those who want the baby to put the baby back to sleep later on a regular schedule.
oh ok if the baby's sleep gets off schedule...still sounds risky to me!
Borg
#209
Dec11-10, 06:06 AM
PF Gold
Borg's Avatar
P: 760
Why take diet pills when you can enjoy AYDS?

Borek
#210
Dec11-10, 06:29 AM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 23,397
Quote Quote by Borg View Post
Why take diet pills when you can enjoy AYDS?
This is unfair - AYDS was created before AIDS was discovered.
Borek
#211
Dec29-10, 06:01 AM
Admin
Borek's Avatar
P: 23,397
http://failblog.org/tag/pepper-spray/
Borg
#212
Dec31-10, 06:52 AM
PF Gold
Borg's Avatar
P: 760
Game Over!

Borg
#213
Feb26-11, 07:31 AM
PF Gold
Borg's Avatar
P: 760
Girlfriend to shoplifter:
Are you happy to see me or is that a chainsaw in your pants?


Andre
#214
May27-12, 05:04 AM
PF Gold
Andre's Avatar
P: 5,458
Why is this thread dead?

Tosh5457
#215
May27-12, 08:36 AM
P: 239
Quote Quote by Andre View Post
Why is this thread dead?

Considering those words as variables, the system it's not impossible only for no = 1, so study = fail a priori


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Too Big To Fail Current Events 8
What would you do if you knew you could not fail? General Discussion 73
Did I pass or FAIL? HELP ME! Academic Guidance 14
What does it mean to fail? General Discussion 5
Trying not to Fail... General Discussion 0