## Unitary operator/matrix

I have a very basic question. I'm confused because I've read in a text that the matrix representation of a unitary operator is a unitary matrix if the basis is orthogonal, however I believe that the matrix is unitary whatever basis one uses. I'd appretiate any comments on this.

 PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia>> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease>> Bringing life into focus
 Blog Entries: 9 Recognitions: Homework Help Science Advisor which text?

 Quote by malawi_glenn which text?
Quantum Mechanics(third edition) E. Merzbacher-Chapter 17 Page 418,I quote :"Since the operators U_a were assumed to be unitary, the representation matrices are also unitary if the basis is orthonormal"

Mentor

## Unitary operator/matrix

Try a simple example. Take the identity matrix on a 2-dimensional space, which is clearly unitary. Use linearity to compute the matrix elements with respect to the basis $e_{1}' = e_1$ and $e_{2}' = e_1 + e_2$, where $e_1$ and $e_1$ make up an orthonormal basis.

Does this give a unitary matrix?

 Mentor A unitary matrix U satisfies $\sum_j U^*_{ji}U_{jk}=\delta_{ik}$. Is this satisfied by the matrix representation of a unitary operator? $$\sum_j U^*_{ji}U_{jk}=\sum_j\langle j|U|i\rangle^*\langle j|U|k\rangle=\sum_j\langle i|U^\dagger|j\rangle\langle j|U|k\rangle=\langle i|U^\dagger\Big(\sum_j|j\rangle\langle j|\Big)U|k\rangle$$ This reduces to $\delta_{ij}$ if the parenthesis is the identity operator. I can prove that it is, if I use that the basis is orthonormal, but not without that assumption. So it looks like your book is right. What makes you think it's wrong?
 thank you people. The orgin of my mistake goes like this : Let T be a untiary operator and |a_i> (i=1,...n) a basis then the matrix elements satisfy, =*=* what a did not realize was that the matriz elementes in the basis |a_i> are only if the basis is orthonomal.
 Mentor Oops, I didn't realize that myself.