Thread Closed

Arguments Against Superdeterminism

 
Share Thread
Nov27-10, 06:06 AM   #137
 

Arguments Against Superdeterminism


Quote by SprocketPower View Post
There is no way philosophy is not a science. Like other sciences it does analysis, makes observations, formulates models, and does rational inquiry, and uses systematic logic and deduction to draw conclusions. Philosophy is definitely and absolutely a science and is definitely and absolutely not an art.
In what way does philosophy even CLAIM to follow the scientific method? SW VandeCarr has made a fine point, now it's time for you to do the same if you can. The scientific method is a clear method which philosophy doesn't want or attempt to emulate, and is in fact, an art.
Nov27-10, 03:08 PM   #138
 
SW VandeCarr,

The article is inrteresting. Philosophy is a general and theoretical science and a basic one. Descartes classified it as the root with 2 branches leading from it including all the other sciences. But your claim that the experimental sciences have displaced philosophy is not at all true because philosophy has always dealt with different questions. And your not goingto find it in anexperimental framework because it is theoretical. And here is what 1 of my classmates said in our on-line metaphysics course:

"Here, Here !

Philosophy is not just a science. It's the science of sciences. It's the source and the core of every science. This can be easily viewed especially in ancient philosophy texts and especially Plato. It is with philosophy that human intellect tried to answer basic and more complex questions about the natural world: reality, being, and existence. It is the effort to answer the primary "why" behind everything."

nismaratwork,

SW VandeCarr did not make a fine point at all and I did. And I didn't say philosophy follows the standard scientific method. It is theoretical, not experimental. If you say that philosophy isn't a science you would have to say the same thing about math and theoretical physics, too.
Nov27-10, 03:10 PM   #139
 
Bell says that SD would get rid of superposition. How would it do this?
Nov27-10, 03:43 PM   #140
 
Quote by nismaratwork View Post
In what way does philosophy even CLAIM to follow the scientific method? SW VandeCarr has made a fine point, now it's time for you to do the same if you can. The scientific method is a clear method which philosophy doesn't want or attempt to emulate, and is in fact, an art.


Philosophy is an inseparable part of the interpretation of the experiemental facts of science and deeply rooted in its assumptions, so science is a form of art?
Nov27-10, 04:03 PM   #141
 
ThomasT and kote,

Why would someone simulate reality? And if we are living in a Matrix, then the reality out there would be the same as in here so it doesn't have much meaning whether we are or not. But there is something that seems rather strange to me and that's the supercluster shaped like a human figure-- a clue hidden in plain sight? Sometimes I wonder.
Nov27-10, 04:08 PM   #142
 
You resurrected a thread to argue a point that is absurd... I'm gone.
Nov27-10, 07:55 PM   #143
Evo
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
Time to say goodbye.
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: Arguments Against Superdeterminism
Thread Forum Replies
why is there such little talk regarding superdeterminism? General Discussion 23
Arguments against LQG Beyond the Standard Model 24
Creationist Arguments. Biology 14
Geometric arguments General Math 5
two contradictory arguments... Introductory Physics Homework 15