Distance between two complex numbers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation and properties of vectors corresponding to complex numbers on an Argand diagram. Participants explore the relationship between vector notation and magnitudes, particularly focusing on the distance between two complex numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a series of equations relating to the vectors OP and OQ, questioning the correctness of their notation and understanding.
  • Another participant confirms that the algebra used in the second line is acceptable but challenges the claim that a vector can equal its magnitude.
  • A later reply clarifies that vector PQ represents a vector, while its magnitude is a numerical value, emphasizing the distinction between the two concepts.
  • There is a discussion about whether stating "vector PQ = the magnitude of [z(2) - z(1)]" is equivalent to the correct notation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the equivalence of vector notation and magnitude, with some asserting that they are distinct while others question the clarity of the distinction.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential confusion surrounding vector notation and magnitude, indicating a need for clarity in definitions and representations in complex number contexts.

naav
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi...i was wondering if someone could confirm if what i have below is correct...thanks...sorry i can't present a diagram...

z(1) = x + iy and z(2) = x(2) + iy(2) are represented by the vectors OP and OQ on an argand diagram...(O is the origin)...imagine the argand diagram...the upper left hand quadrant...(OQ has an argument of say 30 degrees and OP has an argument of 45 degrees - these pieces of information are not relevant anyway)...

is the following correct...

vector OP + vector PQ = vector OQ...

then vector PQ = vector OQ - vector OP

then vector PQ = |z(2) - z(1)|...

1. was wondering if my notation and understanding here is correct...i used algebra in the second line so i was wondering if that is legit...?...

2. is it correct to say in the last line the vector = the magnitude
...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
naav said:
1. was wondering if my notation and understanding here is correct...i used algebra in the second line so i was wondering if that is legit...?...
That's fine.
2. is it correct to say in the last line the vector = the magnitude
That's wrong. You should have:

[tex]\vec{PQ} = z_2 - z_1[/tex]

[tex]|\vec{PQ}| = |z_2 - z_1|[/tex]

Or, in plain text:

vector PQ = z(2) - z(1)
|vector PQ| = |z(2) - z(1)|
 
Hi...thank you very much...

i said in my earlier post...

then vector PQ = |z(2) - z(1)|...

and it was said that it should be...

|vector PQ| = |z(2) - z(1)|

1. isn't that the same thing...

that vector PQ = the magnitude of [z(2) - z(1)]...?...
 
No, it is not the same thing: |vector PQ| is a number (the length of the vector PQ), not a vector.

Likewise "vector PQ" is a vector while "the magnitude of [z(2)-z(1)]" is a number.
 
thank you very much...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K