## Fermions in bound states and their wavefunctions

Hello all,

This may be my very first post on Physics Forums. I am a 1st year physics grad student and need some help on something that's been bugging me. Suppose we have two spin half particles in a bound state. The total spin will either be 0 or 1. The spin 0 state, for example, would be symmetric (even parity right?) so it would need an antisymmetric spatial wavefunction to make the overall wavefunction antisymmetric since we have fermions? But then I thought the overall wavefunction may be symmetric because the total spin is that of a boson?

Rephrased, my question is this: would the total wavefunction have to be antisymmetric since we are dealing with fermions, or would it be symmetric since the total spin is that of a boson?
Which is it and why?

If we came along and didn't know that there were two fermions in there would we think it was a boson?

Does the fermions being in a bound state matter? What about the shape of the potential?

 PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Iron-platinum alloys could be new-generation hard drives>> Lab sets a new record for creating heralded photons>> Breakthrough calls time on bootleg booze

Blog Entries: 27
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Homework Help
Hello ZombieCat! Welcome to PF!
 Quote by ZombieCat Hello all, This may be my very first post on Physics Forums.
uhhh? did you use to be Schrodinger's cat?
 … Rephrased, my question is this: would the total wavefunction have to be antisymmetric since we are dealing with fermions, or would it be symmetric since the total spin is that of a boson? Which is it and why? If we came along and didn't know that there were two fermions in there would we think it was a boson?
It's symmetric because it is a boson …

a bound state of an even number of fermions is a boson.

That's why mesons are bosons, but protons and neutrons are fermions … they're two quarks and three quarks respectively!

Recognitions:
 Quote by ZombieCat Suppose we have two spin half particles in a bound state. The total spin will either be 0 or 1. The spin 0 state, for example, would be symmetric (even parity right?)
Sorry, wrong. The spin-0 state is antisymmetric, and the spin-1 state is symmetric.

## Fermions in bound states and their wavefunctions

Haha! I guess this zombie cat USED to be Schrodinger's cat, but is now the quantum mechanically undead. Thanks Tiny Tim!

As for the symmetry of the spin-0 state, (ud-du)/sqrt(2), I understand that the spins are opposed to make this happen and this state should be antisymmetric... I guess I'm getting confused about the difference between symmetry and parity, (-1)^L. Does this not apply here? Why not?

 Tags bound state, fermions, spin 1/2, wavefunctions