Bohr's Quantization of Angular Momentum


by msavg
Tags: angular momentum, bohr quantization, planck's constant, quantum
msavg
msavg is offline
#1
Aug27-09, 03:26 AM
P: 3
Bohr's second postulate says that it is only possible for an electron to move in an orbit for which its orbital angular momentum L is an integral multiple of [tex]\hbar[/tex].

Can somebody please derive and explain L= n[tex]\hbar[/tex] for me?

I feel like a total dummy for not understanding this, but this is what I have so far:

L= mrv

L=pr, p= hf/c, f= w/2pi, where w is the angular frequency and w= v/r

L= [tex]\hbar[/tex]wr/c = [tex]\hbar[/tex]v/c ??

Yeah... I'm obviously missing something...
:\

Help?


(Thank you in advance.)
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
Edgardo
Edgardo is offline
#2
Aug27-09, 03:55 AM
P: 685
Welcome to physicsforums msavg,

the argument goes like this:
You interpret the electron as a standing wave as depicted here. A circle has circumference [tex]C=2 \pi r[/tex] and the condition for a standing wave is [tex]C=n \lambda[/tex]. From these two equations we get [tex]n \lambda = 2 \pi r[/tex].

De Broglie says [tex]\lambda = h / p[/tex]. Can you proceed?

(Edit: I changed the letter for circumference from L to C since it collides with the notation for the angular momentum)
msavg
msavg is offline
#3
Aug27-09, 04:14 AM
P: 3
Quote Quote by Edgardo View Post
Welcome to physicsforums msavg,

the argument goes like this:
You interpret the electron as a standing wave as depicted here. A circle has circumference [tex]C=2 \pi r[/tex] and the condition for a standing wave is [tex]C=n \lambda[/tex]. From these two equations we get [tex]n \lambda = 2 \pi r[/tex].

De Broglie says [tex]\lambda = h / p[/tex]. Can you proceed?

(Edit: I changed the letter for circumference from L to C since it collides with the notation for the angular momentum)

Thank you.
:)

I knew I was missing something. This makes a whole lot more sense in context of standing waves.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Bohr Quantization Rule for Angular Momentum Advanced Physics Homework 2
quantization of linear momentum Advanced Physics Homework 0
angular momentum quantization Quantum Physics 4
Quantization on momentum space... Quantum Physics 4
Angular momentum and orbital angular momentum problems Introductory Physics Homework 3