Register to reply 
Exact Gauge Symmetry of the Standard Model 
Share this thread: 
#1
Sep209, 10:47 PM

P: 361

Hello:
The gauge symmetry of the standard model is written in authoritative places like wikipedia :) as U(1)xSU(2)xSU(3). This would have 12 elements in its Lie algebra corresponding to one photon, W+, W and W0 or Z, and the 8 gluons. I recall reading discussions that such a characterization is not exactly right. U(1) is a subgroup of SU(2), and SU(2) is a subgroup of SU(3). My vague memory is recalling something like a "flag" must be added to U(1) so that it is nicely separated from SU(2), which also needs one of these flags or markers. If someone in the know could fill me in, it will be appreciated as an hour of Googling did not turn up this detail of the standard model. Thanks, Doug 


#2
Sep209, 11:52 PM

P: 986

U(1), SU(2), and SU(3) in this notation are all distinct groups. 8 generators of SU(3) are gluons. W+, W, Z and gamma are linear combinations of generators of SU(2) and U(1).



#3
Sep309, 06:21 AM

P: 361

Thanks, Doug 


#4
Sep309, 07:52 AM

P: 527

Exact Gauge Symmetry of the Standard Model
Now, this gauge group acts on an internal space carried by the particles. This internal space is a representation of the direct product group [tex]U_Y(1)xSU(2)[/tex] where the Y denotes the weak hypercharge. These representations can be constructed by taking the direct product of representations of the original groups, i.e. [tex]R_{U_Y(1)xSU(2)} = R_{U_Y(1)}\otimes R_{SU(2)}[/tex]. For the force carriers we use the adjoint representation of the gauge group. The adjoint representation of the group U(1) is fairly simply  it's just an expontential, and hence the space it acts on is onedimensional (complex). The adjoint representation of the SU(2) part is a 3dimensional one. So the total representation space is 4dimensional. So the 'flag' that you are talking about is really a reference to the representation that assigned to particular particle (i.e gluons don't carry U(1)xSU(2) etc). The same goes for SU(3). It contains an SU(2) subgroup (it even contains a SU(2)xU(1) subgroup), but you dont identify this group with the electroweak part. It's 'just' some result from group theory. So you have to be careful with what symmetry structure is assigned to what force carrier (this basically comes down to a choice of what particles carry which representation). In that train of thought, there have been GUT proposals that make use of for instance SU(5) or SO(10), since these groups contain the SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) as a subrgoup. By introducing a coupling with a Higgs field and demanding that the Higgs boson acquires some vacuum expectation value, the gauge symmetry is no longer exact and said to be broken. It does not vanish completely though, as the symmetry group is said to break down to a subgroup. In the case of electroweak theory this subgroup is the [tex]U_em(1)[/tex] group identified with electromagnetism. The label is there because the elements of this subgroup can, naturally, be identified with elements of the larger group [tex]U_Y(1)xSU(2)[/tex] (it's a subgroup after all!). And as it turns out, these elements do not correspond with the group [tex]U_Y(1)[/tex] (which is also a subgroup if you consider the elements (a,e)  with e the identity element of [tex]SU(2)[/tex] and a elements of [tex]U_Y(1)[/tex]. This is why the distinction has to be made. I'd be happy to hear any comments about this. 


#5
Sep309, 01:56 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 3,018

People write [tex] U(1)_Y \otimes SU(2)_L \otimes SU(3)_c [/tex] where the U(1) factor is the hypercharge abelian group. Is this what you were looking for 


#6
Sep309, 07:14 PM

P: 136

Also, from the original poster: 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Gauge symmetry and symmetry breaking  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  2  
Does an exact threefold symmetry exist in physics?  General Physics  4  
Symmetry, groups and gauge theories in the standard model  Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics  25 