Understanding the Fusion and Perpetual Motion in Spider Man 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter grass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the portrayal of fusion and perpetual motion in the movie "Spider-Man 2." Participants explore the scientific concepts behind the fictional technology used by the character Doctor Octopus, including the feasibility of such a power source and the implications of extinguishing a fusion reaction with water.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the nature of the fusion technology depicted in the film, asking if it serves as a power source and expressing confusion about the concept of perpetual motion.
  • Another participant suggests that the fusion process involves tritium as fuel and requires extreme temperatures to induce fusion, noting that the mini star must stabilize to avoid catastrophic failure.
  • A different viewpoint asserts that the film employs "comic book physics," which does not accurately reflect real-world physics.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of containment in fusion reactions, arguing that loss of containment would lead to the reaction ceasing rather than continuing uncontrollably, and warns against the dangers of submerging a fusion reaction in water.
  • Another participant points out the presence of spoilers in the thread, indicating that some may not have seen the movie yet.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express confusion and differing interpretations of the fusion concepts presented in the film. There is no consensus on the scientific accuracy of the portrayal, and multiple competing views regarding the feasibility of the depicted technology remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the film's representation of fusion, including the unrealistic portrayal of containment and the effects of water on a fusion reaction. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about the underlying science.

grass
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hey i just watched spidey man2 and was wondering about that fusion thingy that "doctor octopus" created. what is it supposed to be? some sort of power source? i heard them saying something about perpetual motion.. could anyone explain what that is to me?
and.. at the very last part they drowned the huge fire thingy ( i don't know what to call that).. well my question is is that possible in real life? i mean can such a giant ball of firey substance just be stopped by drowning it?
i don't even know if these are sensible questions but pls try to help anyways..
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was absolutely confused as to how that worked also. They said something about harnessing the suns power. I thought that they used tritium (isotope of hydrogen) as their "fuel" for fusion (stars use hydrogen). They would then heat it to extreme temperatures to induce fusion. However, when doc oc did it the first time, the star wouldn't reach an equilibrium (between gravity pulling inwards and pressure pushing outwards [stabilize as they called it]) and thus it exploded (much like a supernova). I think the mini star cannot sustain itself unless it stabilizes. While it is attempting to stabilize the power must be on to constantly allow the tritium fusion to occur. However, the star cannot simply be drowned. If water got anywhere near it, it would evaporate. Ergo, spidey had to shut the power off before it could be drowned in the water.

Now, i could be completely wrong. Does anyone know how it actually worked?
 
They used comic book physics, which bears no resemblance to real physics.
 
I just saw this movie yesterday, and you are completely justified in your confusion. In this post, I will focus on onyl one aspect; the highly dangerous loss of containment that the movie presented as being such a dire event.

In order for a fusion reaction to be sustained, there are a large number of factors which have to be maintained just exactly right. One of these factors is containment. If containment is lost, the reaction ceases. That is one of the reasons fusion power is so desirable, because it is so inherently safe. If the reaction were to run out of control, it will only cause the reaction to stop.

If in fact one had some kind of fusion reaction proceeding in such a way that loss of containment would not cause immediate shutdown, then submersion in water would be useless at best, catastrophic more likely. Ever heard of the "China syndrome"? The dousing in water would set up a huge cloud of radioactive steam which would cover most of the state.
 
shouldn't someone point out that there are spoilers in this thread :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K