What Would a House in More Than Four Dimensions Look Like?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Feynmanfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Multiple
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around conceptualizing a house in more than four dimensions, exploring the implications of higher-dimensional spaces on architecture and human perception. Participants consider both theoretical and imaginative aspects, referencing ideas from physics and literature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a house of more than four dimensions could serve as an experimental probe into architecture, emphasizing the importance of materials and experiential phenomena.
  • Another participant mentions the concept of a tesseract, explaining that it consists of eight cubes, each potentially representing a room, and discusses the implications of moving through these rooms.
  • Some participants propose that a fourth physical dimension could allow beings to interact with our three-dimensional world in ways that are incomprehensible to us, drawing parallels to how a three-dimensional being would interact with a two-dimensional world.
  • There is a suggestion that the appearance of a house would remain unchanged regardless of the number of dimensions, as humans perceive only the dimensions they are familiar with.
  • A later reply questions the nature of the fourth dimension, asking whether it is considered as time or a physical dimension, and discusses the challenges of visualizing higher dimensions.
  • Participants engage in a thought experiment comparing the perception of higher dimensions to how lower-dimensional beings perceive their worlds, using analogies like MRI scans to illustrate the limitations of perception.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the fourth dimension and how it relates to architectural design. There is no consensus on how to visualize or conceptualize a house in more than four dimensions, with multiple competing ideas presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about dimensionality and perception, with some participants relying on mathematical concepts while others draw from physical interpretations. The limitations of human perception in understanding higher dimensions are acknowledged but not resolved.

Feynmanfan
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Dear friends,

I have a friend who studies architecture and has given this difficult task:

<<think of a house of more than 4 dimensions.A small house of 250m2 could act as an experimental probe into an architecture of more than four dimensions; the experiential phenomena of the house will be a crucial factor. The house should also be inhabitable. Materials, from molecular aspects to geometric properties will be important as will space and time. The house will act like a “thought experiment.”
In ‘The Elegant Universe,’ Brian Greene seeks to resolve the incompatibles of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics through String Theory, requiring that we drastically change our understanding of space, matter, and time...>>

Do you have any ideas what this house should look like? Brian Greene describes curious phenomena at the Quantum cafe. Have you come up with any ideas

Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Help with architectural competition

I am also grappling with creating an house of multiple dimension and am having difficultly coming up with a concept. Please help!
Thank you.
 
Look up tesseract.
 
Isn't that from "A Wrinkle in Time"?
 
Well if you were a two-dimensional being and wanted to design a 3-d house a simple solution might be a cube. Each face of the cube would be a room and each edge of the cube would be like a wall with a door through it. Similarly, a tesseract is composed of 8 cubes so each of these cubes could be a room. The geometry would work out such that if you go in a straight line through each room you will eventually end up in the same room.
 
Feynmanfan said:
Do you have any ideas what this house should look like?

I think that you have answered your own question.

No matter how many dimensions we recognize, there is no requirement that this be the limit on the actual number of dimensions. Say, for example, that there are 11 dimensions, or 26. When you look at your house, it will look as it always has. No matter how many dimensions there are, humans can recognize with their eyes how many dimensions they recognize now. YOur house will look the same.

think of a house of more than 4 dimensions.

Furthermore. what does a 4 dimensional house look like? Are you considering time as the fourth dimension? What does time look like in reference to a house?
 
I'm sure he is thinking of a 4th physical dimension rather than time.

This 4th physical dimension to us would be similar to the 3rd physical dimension to a 2 dimensional being. A three dimensional being could, say, poke their finger in and out of the 2D world at various places, and at will. The 2D person would see the "circle" of a finger appear and disappear all around them - or even inside them.

So if the 4th dimension is equally odd, it would be a means for a 4th dimensional being to move about our 3 dimensional world at will. But we wouldn't be able to see or comprehend this dimension fully.

However, if you are talking about a mathematical 4th dimension, then the tesseract or the hypercube is what you are looking for.
 
Enginator said:
I'm sure he is thinking of a 4th physical dimension rather than time.

This 4th physical dimension to us would be similar to the 3rd physical dimension to a 2 dimensional being. A three dimensional being could, say, poke their finger in and out of the 2D world at various places, and at will. The 2D person would see the "circle" of a finger appear and disappear all around them - or even inside them.

So if the 4th dimension is equally odd, it would be a means for a 4th dimensional being to move about our 3 dimensional world at will. But we wouldn't be able to see or comprehend this dimension fully.

However, if you are talking about a mathematical 4th dimension, then the tesseract or the hypercube is what you are looking for.

Lovely imagery. Could you post more examples
 
sol2 said:
Lovely imagery. Could you post more examples

I can think of one more slight variation. Think about moving completely in and out of the 2D world and what the 2D being would see. It would be something like a MRI, where only a cross section of your body is seen at a time.

Of course, this thought experiment is slightly off. Remember that as 3D beings, we really only see 2D images. So the 2D beings only see 1D images. Everything is a line to them. So us entering and exiting their universe appears as a line or series of lines that expand, contract, then disappear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K