Calculating Derivative of $\sigma_N(t)$: A Justification

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Feynman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the derivative of the function $\sigma_N(t) = \sum_{i=1}^{N} g_i(t)$, where each $g_i(t)$ satisfies a specific differential equation. The derivative is expressed using the chain rule, leading to the formulation $\frac{d\sigma_N(t)}{dt} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} \left( \sum_{k=1}^{i-1} \frac{1}{k} K(k, i-k) g_{i-k}(t) g_k(t) - \sum_{l=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{l} K(l, i) g_i(t) g_l(t) \right)$. The discussion emphasizes visualizing the problem through array representation to simplify the understanding of the summation structure involved in the derivative calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, particularly in the context of functions like $g_i(t)$.
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus.
  • Knowledge of summation notation and properties.
  • Basic understanding of matrix representation and array visualization techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of differential equations related to sums of functions.
  • Learn about the chain rule and its applications in multivariable calculus.
  • Explore the concept of matrix representation of summations and its implications in mathematical analysis.
  • Investigate the function $K(k, i-k)$ and its role in the context of the discussed differential equations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus and differential equations, and researchers working on mathematical modeling involving summations of functions.

Feynman
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
:surprise:
Hello,
I've to calculate the derivate of :
[tex] \displaystyle \sigma_{N}(t):=\sum_{i=1}^{N}g_{i}(t) [/tex]
and [tex]g_{i}(t)[/tex] verify the differential equation:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{d g_i}{d t}(t) = <br /> \sum_{k=1}^{i-1} \frac{1}{k}K(k,i-k) g_{i-k}(t) g_k(t) - \sum_{l=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{l}K(l,i) g_i(t)g_l(t)[/tex].

I've to justify:
[tex]\displaystyle \partial_{t}\sigma_{N}(t):= - \sum_{i,j\leqN;i+j>N}\frac{1}{j}K(j,i) g_i(t)g_l(t)[/tex]
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like just some kind of troublesome computation...You may like to "visualise" the problem by putting things in an array (much the same way like you put entries to the matrix). Note the similarities in the two sums in your differential equation (both include summand of the form (1/m*K(m, n)g_n(t)g_m(t)). Then put the summands in an array. Say for example if you are taking m to be the row index and n to be the column index then the sum SUM(l from 1 to infinity) {1/l*K(l, i)g_i(t)g_l(t)} would occupy the entire ith column of your array. From this you may easily "visualise" that your proposition is true.
 


Hello there,

To justify the calculation of the derivative of $\sigma_N(t)$, we can use the chain rule for derivatives. Since $\sigma_N(t)$ is defined as a sum of functions $g_i(t)$, we can write it as:

$\displaystyle \sigma_N(t) = g_1(t) + g_2(t) + ... + g_N(t)$

Now, using the chain rule, we can calculate the derivative of $\sigma_N(t)$ as:

$\displaystyle \frac{d\sigma_N(t)}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}(g_1(t) + g_2(t) + ... + g_N(t))$

$\displaystyle = \frac{dg_1(t)}{dt} + \frac{dg_2(t)}{dt} + ... + \frac{dg_N(t)}{dt}$

Substituting the given differential equation for each $g_i(t)$, we get:

$\displaystyle \frac{d\sigma_N(t)}{dt} = \sum_{i=1}^{N}\left(\sum_{k=1}^{i-1} \frac{1}{k}K(k,i-k) g_{i-k}(t) g_k(t) - \sum_{l=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{l}K(l,i) g_i(t)g_l(t)\right)$

Next, we can rearrange the sums and use the property of summation to write it as:

$\displaystyle \frac{d\sigma_N(t)}{dt} = \sum_{i=1}^{N}\left(\sum_{k=1}^{i-1} \frac{1}{k}K(k,i-k) g_{i-k}(t) g_k(t)\right) - \sum_{l=1}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{N} \frac{1}{l}K(l,i) g_i(t)\right)g_l(t)$

Finally, we can use the definition of $\sigma_N(t)$ to write it as:

$\displaystyle \frac{d\sigma_N(t)}{dt} = \sum_{i=1}^{N}\left(\sum_{k=1}^{i-1} \frac{1}{k}K(k,i-k) g_{i
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K