How Can You Prove the Divisibility of 2x + 3y and 9x + 5y by 17?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter futb0l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divisibility
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the divisibility of the expressions 2x + 3y and 9x + 5y by 17, as outlined in Naoki Sato's notes on Number Theory. The proof utilizes modular arithmetic, specifically congruences, to demonstrate that if 2x + 3y is divisible by 17, then 9x + 5y is also divisible by 17, and vice versa. The key steps involve multiplying by 13 and transforming the equations using properties of modular arithmetic. The clarity of the explanation provided by forum members significantly aided the understanding of the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic number theory concepts
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic and congruences
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
  • Knowledge of integer properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study modular arithmetic in depth, focusing on congruences
  • Explore proofs involving divisibility in number theory
  • Learn about linear combinations and their applications in number theory
  • Review Naoki Sato's notes on Number Theory for additional examples
USEFUL FOR

Students of number theory, mathematicians interested in modular arithmetic, and anyone seeking to enhance their understanding of divisibility proofs.

futb0l
I am reading Naoki Sato's notes on Number Theory:
http://donut.math.toronto.edu/~naoki/nt.pdf

I am on page 2, and doing Example 1.1...

"Let x and y be integers. Prove that 2x+3y is divisible by 17 iff 9x+5y is divisible by 17."

There's ALREADY A SOLUTION on the book, but I do not understand it. I've read the theorems and also the other examples and found that I can understand them. I guess this one is different.

Can somebody please explain it to me clearer...??

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you know some basic things about congruences... If 2x + 3y is divisible by 17, then 2x + 3y == 0 (mod 17). Multiply both sides by 13 to get

13(2x + 3y) == 13(0) (mod 17)
<=>
26x + 39y == 0 (mod 17) ... (1)

But 26 == 9 (mod 17) and 39 == 5 (mod 17), så equation (1) is equivalent to

9x + 5y == 0 (mod 17).

Thus 9x + 5y is divisible by 17.

The other implication, that if 9x + 5y is divisible by 17 then 2x + 3y is divisible by 17, can be proved in a similar fashion.

*edit* After inspection of the PDF, I see that it doesn't use congruences at all. Right, if 2x + 3y is divisible by 17, there is an integer k such that (2x + 3y)/17 = k <=> 2x + 3y = 17k. Multiply both sides by 13 and do some algebra magic (trying to be as clear as possible):

13(2x + 3y) = 13 * 17k
<=>
26x + 39y = 13 * 17k
<=>
9x + 5y + (17x + 34y) = 13 * 17k
<=> (moving over the thing in the parantheses to the right-hand side and factoring out 17
9x + 5y = 13 * 17k - (17x + 34y) = 13 * 17k - 17(x + 2y) = 17(13k - (x + 2y))

Thus 9x + 5y is divisible by 17.
 
Last edited:
oh, great thanks..
you cleared it up beautifully...

i love this forum ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K