Gravity and Time Dilation: Are They One and the Same?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between gravity and time dilation, specifically whether the time dilation effects produced by gravity are equivalent to those produced by motion. Participants explore concepts from general relativity (GR) and special relativity (SR) in the context of how observers perceive time in different gravitational fields and relative velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the time dilation caused by gravity is the same as that caused by motion, seeking clarification on how clocks behave in different frames of reference.
  • Another participant cites GPS as an example, noting that clocks in orbit appear to run faster than those on the ground due to gravitational effects.
  • A follow-up question asks if clocks on Earth would appear to slow down from the perspective of GPS satellites.
  • One participant argues that time retardation due to motion and gravity can yield the same results under certain conditions, suggesting a correlation that may unify GR and SR, but emphasizes that the effects are not reciprocal.
  • Another participant clarifies that in special relativity, proper time is measured in one's own frame, and observations of time dilation in other frames depend on synchronization procedures defined by Lorentz transformations.
  • A participant shares a link to a humorous essay on time dilation, indicating an informal approach to the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the equivalence of time dilation from gravity and motion, with some suggesting a correlation while others emphasize the non-reciprocal nature of these effects. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact relationship between these two forms of time dilation.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific scenarios such as GPS satellites and high-altitude clocks, but the discussion lacks consensus on the implications of these examples. There are also nuances in the interpretation of time dilation effects that are not fully explored.

Moore1879
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
We all know that velocity produces a time dilation, but gravity does too. My question is "Is the dime dilation produced by gravity the same as that produced by motion?"

As you increase velocity your clocks (the clocks in your frame of reference) remain constant to you, but the clocks in other frames seem to slow, correct?

In a gravitational field do the clocks "outside" seem to slow or do they speed up relative to you? Do observers see your clocks slow or speed?

Thanks.
Moore1879

Forgive any mis-spellings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GPS is a good example. The GR effect on the clocks in orbit is that they appear from the ground to be running faster than clocks on the ground.
 
Yes, but the other half of my question was would the clocks on Earth seem to slow to the GPS satillites?
 
"We all know that velocity produces a time dilation, but gravity does too. My question is "Is the dime dilation produced by gravity the same as that produced by motion?"

Yes - the time retardation is the same if you consider an object that is moving (for example with circular motion) on a tether of radius r, at velocity v, as that which would be calculated if you considered the centripetal acceleration (v^2/r). So since acceleration is equivalent to gravity, you get the same result if you calculate the acceleration that corresponds to a particular gravitational potential as you would get if you calculated the escape velocity at the same radius - - but the total time retardation is either one or the other, but not both. Those who are deciples of the inflow theory find important significance in this correlation in that they see it as a defacto unifaction of GR and SR.

Your other question - in GR, the retardation is a one way phenomena in the sense that the situation is not reciprocal. Specifically, an observer on the surface of the Earth does not see a high altitude clock running slow, but a high altitude observer would conclude that the surface clock is running slow when measured against his high altitude clock.
 
"As you increase velocity your clocks (the clocks in your frame of reference) remain constant to you, but the clocks in other frames seem to slow, correct?"

SR says you measure proper time in your own frame, so clocks at rest in your reference frame always measure the same time - no matter what your velocity with respect to whatever. When it is said in SR that you observe clocks running slow in the other frame, what is meant is that you have synchronized two or more clocks in your own frame and using these clocks you can calculate the rate of a single clock in the other frame that is in relative motion. It does not mean you can shine a light on the face of the other clock and make a measurement - it is a restricted procedure th defined by the interpretation to be accorded the Lorentz transforms.
 
Well, want to be amused about time dilation? Then read my ongoing and humorous essay. Since it is long, I put it on my website (NO SPAM INTENDED).

http://digital-universenow.com/Offers_and_Prices.html

or I can email a word PDF copy if anyone wants..
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K