Register to reply

Work-Energy Theorum: Spring potential energy vs Kinetic Energy

Share this thread:
Senjai
#1
Oct10-09, 07:22 PM
P: 104
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

A 1350-kg car rolling on a horizontal surface has a speed v = 40 km/h when it strikes a horizontal coiled spring and is brought to rest in a distance of 2.5 m. What is the spring constant of the spring? Ignore Friction and assume spring is mass-less.

2. Relevant equations
[tex] W = \Delta E[/tex]
[tex] E_{pspring} = \frac{1}{2}(kx^2) [/tex]
[tex] E_k = \frac{1}{2}(mv^2) [/tex]


3. The attempt at a solution

First right off the bat, i converted 40 km/h to its m/s equivalent of aprox. 11.11 m/s

i state the law of conservation of energy: Energy before = Energy after

Therefore:

[tex]
E_k = E_{pspring}
\frac{1}{2}(mv^2) = \frac{1}{2}(kx^2)
[/tex]

then i isolate k

[tex] k = \frac{-mv^2}{x^2} [/tex]

now heres the issue, is x negative? because the displacement is against the direction of motion?
and 2.5m = x, (-2.5)^2 gives me a answer of 4266 Nm
but -(2.5)^2 is entirely different.. This has been a long lasting math issue for me.

And what if x is positive?

i know k MUST be positive right?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Bees able to spot which flowers offer best rewards before landing
Classic Lewis Carroll character inspires new ecological model
When cooperation counts: Researchers find sperm benefit from grouping together in mice
rl.bhat
#2
Oct10-09, 08:21 PM
HW Helper
P: 4,435
(2.5)^2 is correct. There is no negative energy in the nature.
Delphi51
#3
Oct10-09, 08:25 PM
HW Helper
P: 3,394
There is no minus sign in mv^2 = kx^2
or in k = mv^2/x^2. No way you can get k negative!
The minus sign in F = -kx is supposed to help keep track of the fact that the force of the spring is opposite to the direction of stretch but it does seem to have a habit of getting in the way. k is ALWAYS positive.

Senjai
#4
Oct11-09, 08:41 AM
P: 104
Work-Energy Theorum: Spring potential energy vs Kinetic Energy

Thanks, the negative sign on mv^2 was an algebra error... Thanks for the clarification guys!
vaibhav1803
#5
May18-10, 09:56 AM
P: 69
Your attempt is correct but you missed somethingthat for a spring if you take natural length as the datum, the force on change in length is given as:
[tex] \vec{F}= -k \vec{x} [/tex]

and hence work done by a spring against external forces
[tex] W_{s}=\int\vec{F}\vec{.dx} [/tex]
over the required limits

in our case the answer is
[tex]W_{s}=-\frac{kx^{2}}{2}[/tex]
as
[tex]W_{s}=\Delta E[/tex]
[tex]\Delta E=-\frac{mv^{2}}{2}[/tex]
the change part was where you lost it all...the KE FELL TO ZERO. HENCE A NEGATIVE CHANGE.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Work and Potential/Kinetic Energy (spring problem) Introductory Physics Homework 2
Kinetic Energy, Potential Energy, Work Introductory Physics Homework 3
Work-Kinetic Energy Theorum Problem Introductory Physics Homework 3
HELP! ~ Mechanical Energy vs Potential Energy & Kinetic Energy Introductory Physics Homework 4
Mechanical Energy vs Potential Energy & Kinetic Energy Introductory Physics Homework 3