Solving Pressure & Density Variation w/ Height: Sea Level to Atmosphere Edge

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zorodius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Pressure
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the height of the atmosphere based on varying air density with height. The original poster explores two scenarios: one with uniform density and another where density decreases linearly to zero. They express confusion and frustration over their attempts to solve the second part of the problem, particularly regarding the formulation of density as a function of height.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the pressure variation equation but struggles with defining a linear density function. They question the implications of a linear decrease in density and express uncertainty about the relationship between height and density. Other participants suggest using an integral approach to relate pressure and varying density, indicating a shift in perspective on the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different mathematical approaches to the problem, with some suggesting that the integral method is more appropriate for varying density. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's confusion, and while some guidance has been offered, there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that they have attempted multiple approaches without success and questions whether the integral method should have been intuitively known or previously covered in their studies.

Zorodius
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
What would be the height of the atmosphere if the air density (a) were uniform and (b) decreased linearly to zero with height? Assume that at sea level the air pressure is 1.0 atm and the air density is 1.3 kg/m^3.

I solved part a, my question is about part b.

Every approach I have tried with this problem - and I've tried a lot of approaches - has resulted in a useless or wildly incorrect answer. How can this problem be solved?

The most logical thing seems to be using the equation for pressure variation with height:

[tex]p_2 = p_1 + \rho g (y_1 - y_2)[/tex]

Setting level 1 to be sea level, and level 2 to be any level above it, that means:

[tex]p_1 = p_s, ~y_1 = 0, ~y_2 = h[/tex]

Where the subscript s denotes sea level, and h represents the height above sea level. Now for the part where I'm probably going wrong, I need to come up with an expression for density that "linearly decreases to zero with height". That doesn't seem like enough information, since it could lose density at any constant rate and still be "linearly decreasing". The atmosphere could be a centimeter high or it could be a trillion miles tall, and could still have its density versus height graph be a simple line.

Taking my best guess and trying to generalize, I come up with the following expression:

[tex]\rho = \rho_s \cdot (1 - \frac{h}{h_{max}})[/tex]

Rho is the current density, the subscript s denotes the density at sea level, h is the current height, and Hmax is the height at the edge of the atmosphere.

Substituting,

[tex]p_2 = p_s -gh \rho_s \cdot (1 - \frac{h}{h_{max}})[/tex]

[tex]p_2 = p_s -g \rho_s \cdot (h - \frac{h^2}{h_{max}})[/tex]

If the pressure is zero, then we're at the edge of the atmosphere. Then h = Hmax, which means h - h² / Hmax = Hmax - Hmax² / Hmax = Hmax - Hmax = 0, which results in the contradiction 0 = Ps.

I've tried a lot of other approaches, like trying to view it as a limit and use L'Hospital's rule to evalute it, or assuming [itex]d \rho / dh = -1[/itex] and integrating from there to build up an expression for density, but none of these approaches has worked, so I'll spare you all the pointless transcription of my failed work.

How can this be done correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, you should have

[tex]P(h) = g \int_h^H \rho (h) dh[/tex]

with

[tex]\rho (h) = \rho (0) (1- \frac {h} {H})[/tex]

where

[tex]H = h_{max}[/tex]
 
Gokul43201 said:
Actually, you should have

[tex]P(h) = g \int_h^H \rho (h) dh[/tex]
Er. Should I have seen this somewhere before?
 
Gokul43201's integral shows how to find the pressure as function of height when the density varies. You were using [itex]p_2 = p_1 + \rho g (y_1 - y_2)[/itex], which only applies when the density is constant.
 
Doc Al said:
Gokul43201's integral shows how to find the pressure as function of height when the density varies. You were using [itex]p_2 = p_1 + \rho g (y_1 - y_2)[/itex], which only applies when the density is constant.
Thanks, I really appreciate that. I want to know, though, whether the integral he gave is something I would be expected to have just intuitively known, or whether it is something that normally would have been covered in the material preceding this problem?
 
Beats me. But I would say that if you understand the meaning of pressure and the concept of integration, then you should be able to figure it out. After all, it's just a generalization of [itex]p_2 - p_1 = \rho g (y_1 - y_2)[/itex] to get [itex]dp = \rho(y) g dy[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K