Are We All Natural-Born Cyborgs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentat
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of "Natural-Born Cyborgs," as introduced by Andy Clark, which explores the intrinsic relationship between humans and non-organic extensions of the mind. Clark argues that humans already exhibit cyborg characteristics through their interactions with technology, such as using a wristwatch to check the time without conscious thought. The conversation highlights how our cognitive processes are intertwined with external tools, suggesting that as technology evolves, our mental capabilities will increasingly integrate with these extensions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding this relationship for future cultural and technological developments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cognitive psychology concepts
  • Familiarity with the works of Andy Clark
  • Knowledge of human-computer interaction principles
  • Awareness of cultural implications of technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Natural-Born Cyborgs" by Andy Clark
  • Explore cognitive offloading techniques in human-computer interaction
  • Investigate the implications of wearable technology on cognitive processes
  • Study the evolution of human-oriented technology and its cultural impact
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for cognitive scientists, technology developers, and anyone interested in the intersection of human cognition and technology, particularly in understanding how our mental processes are influenced by external tools.

Mentat
Messages
3,935
Reaction score
3
What comes to mind when you hear the word "Cyborg"? Is it an organic being with cybernetic technologies surgically added to it? Such a thing would surely meet the criterion of being both "cyb(ernetic)" and "org(anic)". However, there is another, even more interesting, way in which humans not only will become cyborgs, but already are. Indeed, it is an intrinsic part of our nature (as humans) to do this...we are natural-born cyborgs.

Instead of surgical enhancements, however, Natural-Born Cyborgs (by Andy Clark), deals with a much deeper relationship that we can have with non-organic extensions: namely: extensions of our mind beyond the lump of fat in our skulls.

In this excellent, layman-oriented, book, Clark looks both at ways in which we are already cyborgs (in this new, deeper, sense), and at the ways in which we will become more so, as our cultures and technologies evolve.

To give a taste of just how rich a relationship we have already begun to have, let's look at an example of a mental process. Let's say that I ask you "Do you know the year that Man first landed on the moon?". You would probably say "Yes, 1969". This doesn't mean that you were consciously thinking about the lunar landing at the time of being asked. You, most likely, were not constantly visualizing the year "1969". Yet, when I asked you if you knew, you did not hesitate to say "yes", because you could quickly retrieve it from your memory. This is how our brains naturally work (a very economical strategy). Well, now let's say that I had not asked you about landing on the moon, but instead asked "Do you know what time it is?". You would probably say "Yes" and then quick-check your wristwatch, and say "11:50" (or whatever the time actually was). You didn't say "No, but I can check", you treated the watch as though it were just another ready-at-hand part of your mind.

This may seem like somewhat irrelevant thing, but Clark gives many more compelling examples, as well as predictions of how our minds can continue to become more and more "cyborg" as culture and what he calls "human-oriented" technology evolve.

A very good read for anyone interested in the mind; written with clarity, intelligence, and humor. I highly recommend it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.kitchenmedialab.org/download/cyborgmanifesto1.rtf by Donna Haraway.

(It seemed like a relevant link... Even though the text is pretty incoherent.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mentat said:
Well, now let's say that I had not asked you about landing on the moon, but instead asked "Do you know what time it is?". You would probably say "Yes" and then quick-check your wristwatch, and say "11:50" (or whatever the time actually was). You didn't say "No, but I can check", you treated the watch as though it were just another ready-at-hand part of your mind.

This reminds me of something that I noticed about myself (and other people).

Let's say I was waiting for the time to be 2:00 PM. As the the time draws near, I would look at my watch from time to time to see if it is 2:00 PM.

After I look at my watch, I don't know what time it is, I only recognized that it was not 2:00 PM.

If someones sees me look at my watch and asks me what time it is, I have to look at my watch again because I don't know the answer. (I guess if they asked me if it was 2:00 PM yet, I would have an answer.)

Does this happen to anyone else? (Maybe it's just me and few other mid-westerners.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
15K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K