Understanding Wave Packets and their Role in Particle Physics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave packet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of wave packets in the context of particle physics, exploring their representation of particles, the significance of individual waves within a wave packet, and the conditions under which wave functions can be defined. Participants examine theoretical implications and interpretations related to quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a wave packet is a superposition of waves with slightly different wave numbers, questioning the meaning of the individual waves within this context.
  • One participant warns that wave packets diffuse quickly, while particles are expected to be stable over time, linking this stability to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian.
  • There is a discussion on whether a wave packet can be equated with photons, with some participants clarifying that a wave packet is not a photon but consists of an ensemble of photons.
  • Participants explore the relationship between wave functions and eigenstates, with one asking if specific sine functions in a wave function represent different eigenstates.
  • Another participant explains that for a free particle, the wave function can be any normalizable function, while for non-free particles, it must adhere to boundary conditions.
  • The interpretation of the wave function is discussed in relation to the Born Postulate, which relates the wave function to the probability of finding a particle in a given position.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between wave packets and photons, the meaning of individual waves, and the conditions for defining wave functions. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on interpretations of quantum mechanics, the conditions under which wave functions are defined, and the implications of stability in quantum states. There are unresolved questions regarding the nature of wave packets and their relation to particles.

jby
I read that a wave packet is really some superposition of some waves with different wave number k (just slightly different k's). While the wave packet represents the particle, is there any meaning to the individual wave? How does physicists know what to superpose?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by jby
While the wave packet represents the particle, is there any meaning to the individual wave? How does physicists know what to superpose?

Hi jby,
be careful since you're entering a very dangerous area of physical thinking. A wave packet will diffuse very quickly, while a particle will not. You expect a particle to be stable in time, don't you? Quantum theory tells us that the only states stable in time are the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. And these are what you call the 'individual waves'. A wave packet, as you state correctly, always contains an ensemble of different k's, and thus an ensemble of different eigenstates, and thus an ensemble of photons. Facit: A wave packet is not a photon. Whenever there's a wave, it is made up of an ensemble of photons.
 


Originally posted by arcnets
Whenever there's a wave, it is made up of an ensemble of photons.

I was with you right up to here. Did you mean whenever there's a wave packet, it's made up of an ensemble of photons?
 


Originally posted by arcnets
Hi jby,
be careful since you're entering a very dangerous area of physical thinking. A wave packet will diffuse very quickly, while a particle will not. You expect a particle to be stable in time, don't you? Quantum theory tells us that the only states stable in time are the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. And these are what you call the 'individual waves'. A wave packet, as you state correctly, always contains an ensemble of different k's, and thus an ensemble of different eigenstates, and thus an ensemble of photons. Facit: A wave packet is not a photon. Whenever there's a wave, it is made up of an ensemble of photons.

I don't understand.
Let say, I have a wavefunction = sin x + sin 1.1x + sin 1.2x + sin 1.3x
Do you mean that all four sin's, ie sin x, sin 1.1x, sin 1.2x, and sin 1.3x represents 4 different eigenstates?

And I don't understand this: isn't that a wave packet describes a particle like one photon. We use wave packet concept because it is more localized.
 


Originally posted by Ivan Seeking
Did you mean whenever there's a wave packet, it's made up of an ensemble of photons?

Yes.
 


Originally posted by jby
Do you mean that all four sin's, ie sin x, sin 1.1x, sin 1.2x, and sin 1.3x represents 4 different eigenstates?
Yes.

We use wave packet concept because it is more localized.
You can localize a photon only when it interacts (= is emitted or absorbed). There is no way of determining which path it took.
 
Originally posted by jby
I read that a wave packet is really some superposition of some waves with different wave number k (just slightly different k's). While the wave packet represents the particle, is there any meaning to the individual wave? How does physicists know what to superpose?

If the particle is a free particle [I.e. the potential energy function V(x,y,z) = constant or zero] then the wavefunction can be anything you'd like, so long as the wavefunction is normalizable (i.e. the integral of |Psi(x)|^2 over all x is finite). That means that the particle can be found anywhere on the x-axis.


If the particle is not a free particle then you can have a finite sum of eigenfunctions. But that doesn't mean that you can choose the wavefunction at will. It has to meet the boundary conditions. The eigenfunctions vanish outside the box and are sines and/or cosines inside the box - depending on where the box is.

The meaning of the wavefunction is interpreted by the Born Postulate which says that the wavefunction represents the probability of measuring position, I.e. the probability of finding the particle in the interval x + dx is proportional to |Psi(x)|^2 dx

Therefore: Psi(x,y,z,t) is the probability "amplitude" of the particle's presence. |Psi(x,y,z,t)|^2 is the probability "density"


Pete
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K