Behold the pentaquark: BBC report

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Report
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the discovery of the pentaquark, a particle composed of five quarks. Participants explore its implications, classification, and the nature of quark combinations, touching on theoretical and conceptual aspects of particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about the potential deeper structures in quark binding, suggesting connections to mathematical sequences like the Fibonacci sequence or prime numbers.
  • Questions arise regarding the classification of the pentaquark as a boson or fermion, with some asserting it is considered a boson and that an antiparticle (antipentaquark) could exist.
  • Participants discuss the specific quark composition of the pentaquark, identifying it as consisting of two down quarks, two up quarks, and one antistrange quark.
  • There is a clarification about the terminology of quark "flavors" and "colors," emphasizing that these terms are labels rather than literal descriptions.
  • Some participants debate the implications of the pentaquark discovery on the concept of fundamentality in physics, with differing views on whether it represents a deeper understanding of particle interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the implications of the pentaquark discovery. While some find it interesting and significant, others argue that it does not fundamentally change the existing understanding of quarks as outlined in the standard model. The discussion remains unresolved on the deeper implications of this discovery.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about the nature of quark interactions and the definitions of terms like "fundamentality." Some participants also express uncertainty about the implications of the pentaquark in relation to existing theoretical frameworks.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
"The new particle is the so-called pentaquark - five quarks in formation. Until now, physicists had only seen quarks packed into two- or three-quark combinations"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3034754.stm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I posted the same thing in the regular Physics forum. Hopefully here more people will respond to the news!
 
Cool...

I wonder if this is the signs of some deeper structure in the ways the quarks bind together... Fibonacci sequence? Prime numbers?
 
And to what category pertain the pentaquark? Is a boson or a fermion?
Could the pentaquark have an antiparticle(the antipentaquark)?
 
They consider it a boson. And yes, there could be an anti version of it.
 
So, what quarks does it consist of?
 
Two down, Two up, and 1 antistrange (in this case).
 
Originally posted by Brad_Ad23
Two down, Two up, and 1 antistrange (in this case).

My nuclear knowledge consists of what i got from 2 semesters of Chem.
Studied quarks a little bit and found this discovery interesting. But what is this antistrange orientaion you speak of?
 
Quarks come in six flavors. Top, Down, Bottom, Up, Charm, and Strange. Flavors are not tastes, just some random term physicists used to label the properties. In addition, each quark has one of three colors (not real colors, again just a label sake) associated with the gluons they emitt/absorp. Red, Green, Blue.
 
  • #10
Well, it keeps getting deeper and deeper... hopefully the LHC will sort some of this out.
 
  • #11
what keeps getting deeper and deeper?
 
  • #12
Our conception of fundamentality.
 
  • #13
This doesn't go any more fundamental than quarks, which we already knew existed. Indeed, the standard model does in fact allow for various quark combinations. So in essence, it is just the experimental realization of an aspect of the standard model.

Now, if the experiment had demonstrated that quarks are made up of little things inside them, THEN our conception of fundamentality would become deeper.
 
  • #14
Yes, you're absolutely right. Deeper was definitely the wrong adjective.
 
  • #15
No problem! While this doesn't make it deeper, it is still interesting!
 
  • #16
It sure is interesting. Thanks for the link by the way. I had not read anything about this. It's pretty exciting actually. Ok Ok, I'm kinda nerdy but, it is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K