 |
 |
Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance? |
 |
Nov11-09, 08:01 PM
|
#1
|
thecritic is
Offline:
Posts: 126
|
Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
In the band theory it is said that, in conductors, conduction bands are only half-filled. So, when Electric filed is applied, the electrons can easiliy jump into higher energy states of the same band and move freely.
If the electrons a so free to move, what constitute the resistance of the conductor?
|
|
|
|
|
Nov11-09, 09:43 PM
|
#2
|
sokrates is
Online:
Posts: 356
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
One line answer to your question is: Interaction with environment (lattice, other electrons, impurities, defects, etc...)
There are two main mechanisms that model the interaction of electrons with its environment:
1) Impurity ion scattering (if you have impurities or defects in the lattice)
2) Lattice scattering
Electrons interact with the lattice atoms while propagating through the lattice. With increasing temperature, the lattice jiggles even more wildly so this interaction (electron-phonon) becomes more pronounced.
Intuitively, you could think of electrons colliding with the lattice atoms and losing momentum in the process. This loss of momentum (not necessarily loss of energy) is the cause of resistance. |
|
|
|
|
Nov14-09, 10:44 PM
|
#3
|
thecritic is
Offline:
Posts: 126
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
If electrons are disturbed by the lattice atoms, they can't be called free!!
in the quantum-mechanical view point, their wave-functions extends over the entire length of the conductor; We don't read about the lattice ions wave-function interfering with the electrons wave function!!
This explanation of collision with lattice atoms, seems to be just like a poor method to get-way with the incomplete band-theory!!!
Of-course, I may be wrong, but I am wanting to hear a better explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov14-09, 11:23 PM
|
Last edited by sokrates; Nov14-09 at 11:30 PM..
#4
|
sokrates is
Online:
Posts: 356
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
Originally Posted by thecritic
If electrons are disturbed by the lattice atoms, they can't be called free!!
|
Who says so? Are you saying delocalized electrons never feel any resistance? ...
Originally Posted by thecritic
in the quantum-mechanical view point, their wave-functions extends over the entire length of the conductor; We don't read about the lattice ions wave function interfering with the electrons wave function!!
|
Lattice ions wave function?... Even in ab-initio methods, ions are treated as classical entities. So, no, you won't read about the lattice ions wave-function interfering with the electrons wave function even in a Quantum Transport context.
Originally Posted by thecritic
This explanation of collision with lattice atoms, ...
|
Well, this is not just an explanation. The "interaction" with the lattice IS the primary reason for resistance. As I said: No interaction, no resistance.
Originally Posted by thecritic
... to get-way with the incomplete band-theory
|
Incomplete band-theory? Do you mean to say free-electron model or something?
Originally Posted by thecritic
Of-course, I may be wrong, but I am wanting to hear a better explanation.
|
Then ask more relevant questions!
|
|
|
|
|
Nov15-09, 01:55 PM
|
#5
|
carbon9 is
Offline:
Posts: 38
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
Hi,
About the resistance of nanodevice, you can look at this site. I think you can find an explanation: http://nanohub.org/resources/2041/
Cheers |
|
|
|
|
Nov16-09, 02:23 AM
|
#6
|
DrDu is
Offline:
Posts: 18
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
To address the objections of "thecrictic" and "sokrates": Instead of collision with the lattice atoms I would speak of interaction with the lattice vibrations (phonons).
|
|
|
|
|
Nov16-09, 10:34 AM
|
#7
|
sokrates is
Online:
Posts: 356
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
Originally Posted by DrDu
To address the objections of "thecrictic" and "sokrates": Instead of collision with the lattice atoms I would speak of interaction with the lattice vibrations (phonons).
|
This is a semantic issue. The treatment of electron-phonon interaction conserves momentum (and energy if the collision is elastic) just like classical billiard balls.
The mathematics is the same. But to avoid imagining a "mechnanical" collision, some authors prefer the word "interaction".
|
|
|
|
|
Nov17-09, 03:24 AM
|
#8
|
DrDu is
Offline:
Posts: 18
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
That is not quite true, as far as I know. The electron phonon interaction conserves crystal momentum k, but in general not the true momentum p. In so called Umklapp processes, momentum can be transferred to the crystal. However, at very low temperatures, this mechanism becomes inefficient. If the crystal is very pure, scattering at inhomogeneities is also unimportant. One then has to take into account scattering at the boundaries of the crystal. |
|
|
|
|
Nov17-09, 11:54 AM
|
#9
|
sokrates is
Online:
Posts: 356
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
Originally Posted by DrDu
That is not quite true, as far as I know. The electron phonon interaction conserves crystal momentum k, but in general not the true momentum p. In so called Umklapp processes, momentum can be transferred to the crystal. However, at very low temperatures, this mechanism becomes inefficient. If the crystal is very pure, scattering at inhomogeneities is also unimportant. One then has to take into account scattering at the boundaries of the crystal.
|
Momentum in this context, is almost ALWAYS, the crystal momentum.
In an effective mass description, one NEVER knows the true momentum anyway... Crystal momentum doesn't mean the momentum of the lattice. It is the effective momentum of a propagating electron as if the electron is traveling through vacuum, instead of the very complicated nuclear potential landscape.
Surely, momentum can be transferred to the crystal (to phonons), just like a moving billiard ball's momentum can be transferred to a stationary billiard ball, after a binary scattering event.
I don't know why you bring up the Umklapp processes and how they are relevant. The original question is much more elementary.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov18-09, 03:10 AM
|
#10
|
DrDu is
Offline:
Posts: 18
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
First again to my post #7. I didn't want to make a semantic distinction between collisisons and interactions but between the interaction with the (periodic) lattice on one side and with phonons on the other.
Refering to your answer #9, I disagree that momentum in this context is always the crystal momentum. The electric current is, cum grano salis, the total momentum and not the crystal momentum. Hence the effect of resistance is a decrease of total momentum while crystal momentum is strictly conserved, at least in an infinite lattice.
There exists some theorem due to Peierls stating that resistance due to electron phonon scattering can only arise due to Umklapp scattering. |
|
|
|
|
Nov18-09, 09:01 PM
|
#11
|
sokrates is
Online:
Posts: 356
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
U-scattering mainly reduces thermal conductivity.
Resistance can arise due to many other e-p interactions.
ADP, ODP, POP, etc.....
I'd like to see the theorem you are mentioning, could you give the name of the book?
|
|
|
|
|
Y, 04:44 AM
|
#12
|
DrDu is
Offline:
Posts: 18
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
There's a nice interview of Hans Bethe by Mermin, where Bethe also mentions the theorem which stems from a time when he and Peierls where both doctorands with Sommerfeld:
http://www.ias.ac.in/resonance/Oct2005/
I suppose it can also be found in the book by Peierls on solid state physics.
It think to have it seen to be discussed at length in "electrons and phonons" by Ziman.
Basically, the phonons can only come in equilibrium with the lattice due to U processes. If there were no U processes, both the electrons and the phonons would flow with respect to the lattice, so that no resistance would arise. |
|
|
|
|
Y, 08:20 PM
|
Last edited by sokrates; Y at 08:27 PM..
#13
|
sokrates is
Online:
Posts: 356
|
Re: Band theory of Conduction, what constititue resistance?
Originally Posted by DrDu
If there were no U processes, both the electrons and the phonons would flow with respect to the lattice, so that no resistance would arise.
|
Not quite true.
First of all, apart from any phonon discussion : Phonons are not the only sources of resistance, what about impurity ions? disorder? other carriers? surface roughness?
And remember there's also N-processes for phonon absorption (Check Kittel, for instance). So I am not at all sure whether the U-processes are exclusively responsible for phonon absorption. This doesn't sound right.
edit:(I'll check the books and clarify it -- I am just very busy at the moment, thanks for the links!)/
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
