| Thread Closed |
Changing from rectangular coordinate to sperical |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov14-09, 03:13 PM | #1 |
|
|
Changing from rectangular coordinate to sperical
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
change from rectangle to spherical coordinate : z^2 = x^2 + y^2 I know that : z = pcos(phi) x = psin(phi)cos(theta) y = psin(phi)sin(theta) there fore z^2 = x^2 + y^2 in spherical coordinate is p^2cos(phi)^2 = (psin(phi)cos(theta))^2 + (psin(phi)sin(theta))^2 = cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi)*cos^2(theta) + sin^2(phi)*sin^2(theta) = cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi) + sin^2(phi) = cos^2(phi) = 2*sin^2(phi) But the book has it as : cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi) ?? what gives? |
| Nov14-09, 03:19 PM | #2 |
Recognitions:
|
How did you conclude that sin^2(phi)*cos^2(theta) + sin^2(phi)*sin^2(theta) equals sin^2(phi) + sin^2(phi)??
|
| Nov14-09, 03:24 PM | #3 |
|
|
cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi)[cos^2(theta) + sin^2(theta)] hope that helps. |
| Nov14-09, 03:30 PM | #4 |
|
|
Changing from rectangular coordinate to sperical[tex] \cos^2(\phi) = \sin^2(\phi)[/tex] while correct, isn't completely simplified. Can you see that the final answer should be of the form [itex]\phi = C[/itex] for the appropriate value of the constant C, and that the surface is actually one of the parameter surfaces for spherical coordinates? |
| Nov14-09, 04:01 PM | #5 |
|
|
Yes I see what I did wrong.
It is cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi) = cos(phi) = sin(phi) >> . Can you see that the final answer should be of the form phi = C. Yes I guess pi/2 would be correct. So the equation z^2 = x^2 + y^2 is phi = pi/2 in spherical coord? |
| Nov14-09, 04:06 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
| Nov14-09, 05:23 PM | #7 |
|
|
I mean pi/4.
|
| Nov14-09, 05:40 PM | #8 |
|
|
|
| Nov14-09, 05:54 PM | #9 |
|
|
-pi/4 ?
would this be ok : plus/minus : n*pi/4n : where n is a integer. OR no because phi is limited to 0 <= phi <= pi |
| Nov14-09, 06:00 PM | #10 |
|
|
|
| Nov14-09, 06:18 PM | #11 |
|
|
Is there a bottom half? I don't think it will be within bounds because
only pi/4 would solve | tan(phi) | = 1 where 0<= phi <= pi. | tan( -pi/4) |= 1 but thats no within bounds and |tan( 5pi/4 ) |= 1 but thats also not within bounds, and those 2 points are the next points which satisfies the equation. |
| Nov14-09, 07:09 PM | #12 |
|
|
Yes, there is a bottom half. In your original xyz equation z can be negative. Draw a sketch of the cone, top and bottom. Just look at it. There obviously is a [itex]\phi[/itex] that gives the bottom half.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Changing from rectangular coordinate to sperical
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Changing rectangular coordinates to polar coordinates ? | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 6 | ||
| Why do fluid drops are sperical? | Classical Physics | 3 | ||
| changing polar equations to rectangular equations???? | Precalculus Mathematics Homework | 2 | ||
| sperical charge dist | Introductory Physics Homework | 7 | ||