Register to reply

Chain rule question

by bitrex
Tags: chain, rule
Share this thread:
Nov26-09, 08:21 PM
P: 196
I'm having some trouble following this equation:

[tex]\frac {d \Phi_B} {dt} = (-) \frac {d}{dx_C} \left[ \int_0^{\ell}dy \ \int_{x_C-w/2}^{x_C+w/2} dx B(x)\right] \frac {dx_C}{dt} = (-) v\ell [ B(x_C+w/2) - B(x_C-w/2)] \ [/tex]

Shouldn't the differentiation of the bracketed terms "killed" the integration of B(x)? Why is it still evaluated between the limits in the final expression? Thanks for any advice.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
FIXD tells car drivers via smartphone what is wrong
Team pioneers strategy for creating new materials
Team defines new biodiversity metric
Nov27-09, 09:16 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 4,300
There is a theorem in calculus that
[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \int_0^x f(y) \, dy = f(x) [/tex]
(i.e. differentiating with respect to the integral boundary)
which you should be able to find in your calculus book.

You can prove your identity by taking any fixed point [itex]x_C - w/2 < x_0 < x_C + w/2[/itex] and write
[tex] \int_{x_C - w/2}^{x_C + w/2} dx B(x) = \int_{x_C - w/2}^{x_0} dx B(x) + \int_{x_0}^{x_C + w/2} dx B(x) = \int_{x_0}^{x_C + w/2} dx B(x) - \int_{x_0}^{x_C - w/2} dx B(x)[/tex]
Nov28-09, 01:21 AM
P: 196
Thank you! That's a good theorem to know!

Nov28-09, 06:20 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 39,552
Chain rule question

Yes, it's called the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus!
Nov28-09, 03:57 PM
P: 196
Well, I suppose if I can't recognize that, this is all kind of a lost cause!
Nov29-09, 01:30 PM
P: 240
actually a more general theorem is:


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Chain rule question Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Derivatives Chain Rule question Calculus & Beyond Homework 9
Chain rule question Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Chain Rule/Product Rule Question Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Chain Rule Question Introductory Physics Homework 4