## Chain rule question

I'm having some trouble following this equation:

$$\frac {d \Phi_B} {dt} = (-) \frac {d}{dx_C} \left[ \int_0^{\ell}dy \ \int_{x_C-w/2}^{x_C+w/2} dx B(x)\right] \frac {dx_C}{dt} = (-) v\ell [ B(x_C+w/2) - B(x_C-w/2)] \$$

Shouldn't the differentiation of the bracketed terms "killed" the integration of B(x)? Why is it still evaluated between the limits in the final expression? Thanks for any advice.
 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> King Richard III found in 'untidy lozenge-shaped grave'>> Google Drive sports new view and scan enhancements>> Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study
 Blog Entries: 5 Recognitions: Homework Help Science Advisor There is a theorem in calculus that $$\frac{d}{dx} \int_0^x f(y) \, dy = f(x)$$ (i.e. differentiating with respect to the integral boundary) which you should be able to find in your calculus book. You can prove your identity by taking any fixed point $x_C - w/2 < x_0 < x_C + w/2$ and write $$\int_{x_C - w/2}^{x_C + w/2} dx B(x) = \int_{x_C - w/2}^{x_0} dx B(x) + \int_{x_0}^{x_C + w/2} dx B(x) = \int_{x_0}^{x_C + w/2} dx B(x) - \int_{x_0}^{x_C - w/2} dx B(x)$$
 Thank you! That's a good theorem to know!

Recognitions:
Gold Member
Science Advisor
Staff Emeritus

## Chain rule question

Yes, it's called the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus!
 Well, I suppose if I can't recognize that, this is all kind of a lost cause!
 actually a more general theorem is: $$\frac{d}{dx}\int^{b(x)}_{a(x)}f(s)ds=f(b(x))\frac{db}{dx}-f(a(x))\frac{da}{dx}$$
 Thread Tools

 Similar Threads for: Chain rule question Thread Forum Replies Calculus & Beyond Homework 0 Calculus & Beyond Homework 9 Calculus & Beyond Homework 2 Calculus & Beyond Homework 2 Introductory Physics Homework 4