Do Black Holes Emit Higgs Particles in Hawking Radiation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the emission of Higgs particles in Hawking radiation from black holes. It asserts that while Higgs particles are theorized to explain particle mass, their existence remains unproven at the proposed energy levels. The conversation critiques the notion that disproving Higgs particles is as significant as proving their existence, emphasizing the limitations of current scientific understanding and the need for a reevaluation of fundamental physics rather than reliance on complex particle accelerators.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hawking radiation
  • Familiarity with the Higgs field and Higgs bosons
  • Knowledge of quantum theory and general relativity
  • Basic principles of particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Hawking radiation on black hole thermodynamics
  • Explore the role of the Higgs field in particle mass generation
  • Investigate current experimental efforts to detect Higgs bosons
  • Study the limitations of quantum theory and general relativity in explaining cosmic phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the intersection of black hole physics and particle theory.

kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
Do black holes emit Higgs particles in the Hawking radiation, as particles on their own, in addition to the Higgs particles associated with the mass of other particles such as electrons, which are emitted in the Hawking radiation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Good question. As a corrolary, what particles can be emitted as Hawking radiation, and do the particles so emitted need time and space to become "properly" associated with the Higgs field so that they accumulate some mass? :-)

Higgs particles and the Higgs field are postulated to explain why atomic particles have mass, which cannot be accounted for by the attributes of their constituent parts. So far, these particles have not been found anywhere near the energies where they were proposed to be found. If you search the popular literature on the subject, you will see references to a very odd quote on the lines of "proving the Higgs particles do not exist will be as scientifically important as confirming their existence" or something similar. This is utter nonsense. There would be something imporant to be gained by confirming the existence of Higgs particles, but they CANNOT be proved not to exist, any more than one can prove that Bigfoot does not exist - nor should any reasonable scientist spend more than a minute in that endeavor. In my very humble opinion, the person who made that statement is either unaware of the scientific process or they have a vested interest in building and maintaining obscenely expensive particle accelerators.

BTW, does anyone here know how many Higgs Bosons can dance on the head of a pin? I know that sounds flippant (to anybody who knows about the history of European religious orthodoxy), but if quantum theory and general relativity, et al, do not adequately explain our universe, it seems a bit presumptuous to measure the error and then ascribe the error to the existence of the effects of a previously-unknown class of particles acting within a previously unknown field. We may need to re-examine our basic physics instead of applying more and more band-aids.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K