Register to reply 
Can the wave function be a constant? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Dec109, 03:33 AM

P: 37

I'm wondering if the wave function can be a constant in some special cases?
Now I understand that if we have a one dimensional wave function describing the location of a particle (say, along the xaxis), then the wave function can not be a constant. If it was, then it wouldn't be normalizable. But what if the particle is free to move in a circle? The we have [tex]\psi(\theta) = \psi(\theta + 2 * \pi)[/tex] 


#2
Dec109, 03:45 AM

P: 171

Yes exactly. The particle on a ring has a constant wavefunction for the k=0 momentum eigenstate. The sorbital in an atom is a bit like a constant wave function too, except it decays with radius. Similarly, the wavefunction for the particle on a ring isn't constant if you take into account the space outside the ring.



#3
Dec109, 03:50 AM

P: 37

And it's the bondary conditions that allow n to be 0? I suppose so since it were the boundary conditions that dissaloved n to be 0 in the case of the infinite square well. Thanks for your answer :)
Regards Frímann 


#4
Dec109, 05:35 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,866

Can the wave function be a constant?
If the wave function is constant in position space, then it's a delta function in momentum space. I don't see how that could be a valid solution to the S.E.



#5
Dec109, 06:07 AM

P: 171

alxm, you have a slight confusion I believe.
'Can the wavefunction be constant?' is not the same as whether it solves the timeindependent SE. A valid wavefunction in the position representation is one which is continuous. If we are going to have valid wave function which is constant, it has to exist in a space with boundary conditions which allow it to be constant: so it has to exist in a periodic (compact) space. For a general Hamiltonian on such a space, such a wave function will evolve in time according to the TDSE and no longer be constant in space. For the special case of a free particle hamiltonian on a periodic space, H = p^2/2m, the constant wavefunction will also be an eigenstate with 0 energy, so it will also solve the TISE. 


#6
Dec109, 06:30 AM

P: 114




#8
Dec109, 06:38 AM

P: 171

I think the original question was concerned with 'constant in space' wave functions. In fact any momentum mode for a free particle on a ring has a probability density which is constant in space, but only the k=0 mode has no spatial dependence for the wavefunction.
Constancy in time only makes sense for the probability density, since an arbitrary shift of the definition of energy can alter the time dependence of all states. Eigenstates of the hamiltonian are 'stationary' in the sense that the expectation value of any observable is time independent. It is certainly not the case that eigenstates of the hamiltonian have no time dependence. 


#9
Dec109, 07:12 AM

P: 114

Also i realized that my comment is irrelevant to the original post. 


#10
Dec109, 08:15 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,866

I see what you're talking about now. Yes, if you've got a 1dimensional 'particle in a box' where you give it periodic boundary conditions, then the plane wave solutions [tex]\psi_n = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{inx}[/tex] are normalizable and valid, and the constant wave function [tex]\psi_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}[/tex] is a solution, with definite energy and momentum. (zero and zero in that case) 


#11
Dec109, 12:36 PM

P: 171

What I'm getting at with the sorbital analogy is that there are a number of spaces on which the 'constant function' is a solution to laplace's equation: one such space is the sphere; another is a torus; another is a line with periodic boundary conditions. All these spaces are compact, which allows the constant function to be normalised to unity.
The free particle on a sphere problem (rigid rotator) has energy eigenstates which are also eigenstates of angular momentum. The l=0 spherical harmonic is a constant function. The free particle on a torus has energy eigenstates which are also eigenstates of momentum. The kx=ky=0 state is a constant function. The other point I was getting at is that the constant function is a valid state for single particle QM on such spaces, even if it is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. In this case, if you prepare the system such that the particle wave function is constant, in a few ns, the wavefunction will have evolved according to the TISE and will no longer be constant. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Intro QM: Add a constant to the Potential, Effect on Wave Function?  Advanced Physics Homework  5  
A seeming contrdiction in deriving wave function for delta function potential  Quantum Physics  2  
Determine a function that calculates the nth weight factor of a wave function  Advanced Physics Homework  0  
Particle wave conception of wave function  General Physics  0 