Rank 2 and rank 1 field theories

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field rank Theories
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between rank 1 and rank 2 field theories, particularly in the context of tensor products, spin representations, and the implications for gravitational force carriers. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications related to quantum field theory and the properties of tensor fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a rank 2 field can be viewed as the tensor product of two rank 1 vector fields, linking this to tensorial rank and spin in quantum field theory.
  • Others suggest that the Cartesian product might be a more appropriate interpretation than the dot product when discussing the relationship between rank 1 and rank 2 fields.
  • A participant explains that combining two spin-1 systems results in a total spin that can be 0, 1, or 2, and discusses the implications for irreducible representations in quantum field theory.
  • Another participant questions the nature of a gravitational force carrier, proposing a model where it is composed of two spin-1 particles and explores the conditions under which this would yield a spin-2 particle.
  • There is a mention of specific conditions regarding the Lagrangian that would ensure the construction of a spin-2 field from spin-1 fields, highlighting that not all spin-2 fields can be constructed in this manner.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of rank 2 fields and their relation to rank 1 fields, with no consensus reached on the interpretations or implications discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of tensorial rank and the specific conditions under which certain field theories can be constructed. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the relationship between spin and field theory.

kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
Can a rank 2 field be considered, in principle, to be the dot product of two rank 1 vector fields?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what you're talking about really, but I would guess "cross product" or "Cartesian product" instead of dot product. The reals (1-space) form a vector space and a field, and the cartestian product R x R gives R² (2-space), which is vector space (and would be a field, I imagine). So guessing as to what you mean, I would think Cartesian product is your answer.
 
kurious said:
Can a rank 2 field be considered, in principle, to be the dot product of two rank 1 vector fields?

You should specify what you mean. I guess you're talking about tensorial rank. In that case, indeed, the tensor product of two rank 1 tensor fields yields a tensor field of rank 2. In a quantum field theory setting, tensorial rank is related (although not completely equivalent) with spin, and the tensor product is associated with combining two systems. So the quantum version is that the sum of two spin-1 systems contains (but is not equal to) a spin-2 system.
The difference is in what is called irreducible representations.
A tensor field of rank 1 is an irreducible representation, and hence fully maps onto a spin-1 field. However, a tensor field of rank 2 is not irreducible ; in fact it corresponds to a sum of a spin-2 field, a spin-1 field and a scalar (spin 0) field. This comes down to the property that combining 2 spin-1 systems gives you a total spin which can be 0, 1 or 2.

cheers,
Patrick.
 
Vanesch:
This comes down to the property that combining 2 spin-1 systems gives you a total spin which can be 0, 1 or 2.

Kurious:

Supposing I said that the gravitational force carrier was
made of two spin 1 particles coupled together.What would make the carrier just a spin 2 particle in total? I am thinking here of trying to reduce gravity
to being another case of electromagnetism.
My basic idea is this:
mass could be caused by electric charges in space interacting with protons and electrons.So a massless force carrier could just be an electrically neutral phenomenon moving through the
mass-causing charges in space.
 
Last edited:
kurious said:
Supposing I said that the gravitational force carrier was
made of two spin 1 particles coupled together.What would make the carrier just a spin 2 particle in total?
All you have to do is make sure the lagrangian depends only on the traceless symmetric product,
[tex]\frac{1}{2} (A_\mu B_\nu + B_\mu A_\nu) - \eta^{\mu \nu}(A_\rho B^\rho})[/tex].
Also you should be aware that not every spin 2 field can be constructed this way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K