Resolving conflict

by saltine
Tags: conflict, resolving
saltine is offline
Dec18-09, 01:04 PM
P: 102
I was whether there is a general way to resolve a conflict like the one happening at Copenhagen, but without the debate related to climate change. The following is the essence of the problem, is there a way to show that such a conflict is unresolvable? Perhaps from the study of game theory or economics?

Description of the situation:

There are three stakeholders A, B, and C. In general, each stakeholder wants to upgrade itself. A upgraded itself from A1 to A3 by taking it from C. This allowed A to upgrade relatively fast, but in the meantime downgraded C from C3 to C1. If C downgrades to C0, everybody dies. Now, B wants to upgrade itself the same way as A did. A says B cannot do that because everyone will die. So B suggests that A downgrade itself to upgrade C, so that B can take from C.

It seems that A should either downgrade itself to upgrade B or do as B said: give back to C so that B could take from it.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes

Register to reply

Related Discussions
about resolving power? General Physics 7
GR and QM conflict Special & General Relativity 0
Resolving a disagreement Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 0
Resolving Power Introductory Physics Homework 1
Help with resolving along a plane Introductory Physics Homework 1