Register to reply

Resolving conflict

by saltine
Tags: conflict, resolving
Share this thread:
saltine
#1
Dec18-09, 01:04 PM
P: 101
I was whether there is a general way to resolve a conflict like the one happening at Copenhagen, but without the debate related to climate change. The following is the essence of the problem, is there a way to show that such a conflict is unresolvable? Perhaps from the study of game theory or economics?

Description of the situation:

There are three stakeholders A, B, and C. In general, each stakeholder wants to upgrade itself. A upgraded itself from A1 to A3 by taking it from C. This allowed A to upgrade relatively fast, but in the meantime downgraded C from C3 to C1. If C downgrades to C0, everybody dies. Now, B wants to upgrade itself the same way as A did. A says B cannot do that because everyone will die. So B suggests that A downgrade itself to upgrade C, so that B can take from C.

It seems that A should either downgrade itself to upgrade B or do as B said: give back to C so that B could take from it.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
New model helps explain how provisions promote or reduce wildlife disease
Stress can make hard-working mongooses less likely to help in the future
Grammatical habits in written English reveal linguistic features of non-native speakers' languages

Register to reply

Related Discussions
About resolving power? General Physics 7
GR and QM conflict Special & General Relativity 0
Resolving a disagreement Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 0
Resolving Power Introductory Physics Homework 1
Help with resolving along a plane Introductory Physics Homework 1