Gravity Repulsion


by Riogho
Tags: gravity, repulsion
Riogho
Riogho is offline
#1
Jan13-10, 03:48 PM
P: 125
Every other force attracts and repels, gravity does not. Gravity only attracts. This is assymmetrical. We like to assume things that are not symmetrical are wrong. Why do we not assume this is wrong?

Is there any possible way gravity could be repulsive? I know there is staggering amounts of evidence to suggest it isn't, but why not on very small lengths, say planck length, that gravity actually becomes repulsive.

Maybe the repulsion is just "gravitons" get so thick in an exchange between two particles it just pushes them away to a very small length until the density of them goes down.

Things like this idea would solve the idea of a singularity existing at the center black holes and such.

Do we have any experimental data at such small scales? Do we have anything that disproves an idea like this?

Just wondering.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
Bob S
Bob S is offline
#2
Jan13-10, 03:59 PM
P: 4,664
Search for the phrase "The nuclear force is only felt among hadrons. At much smaller separations between nucleons the force is very powerfully repulsive," in

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force

How could anyone find a gravitational force at small distances with strongly interacting particles around? Perhaps using weakly-interacting non-electromagnetic particles?

Bob S
mgb_phys
mgb_phys is offline
#3
Jan13-10, 03:59 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 8,961
Theres no evidence that gravity can be repulsed or even changed.
Yes that doesn't fit into the pattern but thats not a very good reason to base anything on.

Riogho
Riogho is offline
#4
Jan13-10, 04:07 PM
P: 125

Gravity Repulsion


Quote Quote by Bob S View Post
How could anyone find a gravitational force at small distances with strongly interacting particles around? Perhaps using weakly-interacting non-electromagnetic particles?

Bob S
Maybe the inability to see it is why we think it isn't there. Perhaps there is some way to assume what it is SUPPOSED to be, and we can see if there is any difference between that and what we experimentally see. Maybe the difference is gravity.

Because gravity is very weak anyway, the repulsion would logically be weak.

Also, on another related question (so as not to make another thread), if dark matter only interacts through the gravitational force, why is it not all just clumped together in one spot? Since there is no electromagnetic force to repulse it.
Bob S
Bob S is offline
#5
Jan13-10, 04:20 PM
P: 4,664
Quote Quote by Riogho View Post
if dark matter only interacts through the gravitational force, why is it not all just clumped together in one spot? Since there is no electromagnetic force to repulse it.
A negligible scattering cross section plus remanent angular momentum of individual dark-matter particles around galactic centers will prevent clumping.
Bob S
TheNerf
TheNerf is offline
#6
Jan15-10, 03:28 PM
P: 3
A point in space where the total magnitude of energy is less than zero from our frame of reference. Better known as the theoretical negative mass. Let's just say physics isn't directly touching that subject yet, but there are people thinking about it.

Oh and it's pretty arrogant to assume dark matter doesn't contain it's own particles of time interaction capable of repulsing each other. Do you really think everything is just made of protons/neutrons/electrons?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Gravity as Repulsion General Physics 29
repulsion Introductory Physics Homework 1
Electromagnetic Repulsion Introductory Physics Homework 9
born repulsion Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1
Attraction -- Repulsion General Discussion 7