Understanding Type II Supernovae: N-Star vs. BH Supernova Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter turin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Supernova
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the mechanisms behind Type II supernovae, particularly the processes involved in the collapse of massive stars and the formation of neutron stars or black holes. Participants explore the conditions leading to a supernova event, the role of neutron degeneracy pressure, and the implications of core collapse on the surrounding stellar material.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a Type II supernova occurs when a collapsing neutron core overshoots its stable neutron degenerate radius, leading to a rebound that ejects material into space.
  • Others question how an extremely massive star can produce a supernova if a black hole forms, suggesting that a black hole would not rebound and thus would not lead to an explosion.
  • One participant discusses the process of iron fusion and subsequent photodisintegration, which reduces the core's ability to support itself, leading to collapse.
  • There is uncertainty regarding whether the conditions during the collapse are sufficient to form a black hole and what mechanisms, if any, prevent this from happening.
  • Some participants express confusion about the relationship between the collapsing core and the remaining stellar material, questioning whether the accretion of this material contributes to the supernova's energy output.
  • A participant indicates they are preparing a more detailed response but may not be able to contribute for several days, inviting others to engage in the discussion in the meantime.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the processes involved in Type II supernovae, particularly regarding the formation of black holes and the role of neutron degeneracy pressure. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the conditions necessary for black hole formation and the specifics of neutron degeneracy pressure. Some mathematical steps and definitions are not fully explored, leaving room for further clarification.

turin
Homework Helper
Messages
2,314
Reaction score
3
As I understand it, a Type II supernova occurs because the collapsing neutonium core of a dying large star overshoots its stable neutron degenerate radius and therefore rebounds, blasting the leftovers out into space. Is this correct?

How, then, does a dying extremely massive star create a supernova? I did not think that a black hole would (or could) rebound.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
turin said:
As I understand it, a Type II supernova occurs because the collapsing neutonium core of a dying large star overshoots its stable neutron degenerate radius and therefore rebounds, blasting the leftovers out into space. Is this correct?

How, then, does a dying extremely massive star create a supernova? I did not think that a black hole would (or could) rebound.
The Type II has a "last stage" of silicon fusing to 56NI and then immediately changing to 56Fe before the collapse. The whole link below is pretty good stuff, but see pages 4, 5 and 6 for Type II specifics.

http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/teaching/ph28010/ph28010-11.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But after the fusion to iron, then the iron ash heats up to the point that photodesintigration sets in. This takes energy away from the iron ash core which inhibits its ability to support the rest of the star. The disintegrated core therefore collapses as a swarm of nucleons which recedes away from the outer layers of the star, essentially isolating itself for a (very) brief period. These nucleons have a stable density that can be supported by neutron degeneracy pressure. However, they are collapsing so fast that they overshoot this density. Here's where I am having trouble understanding:

If the stable density of these nucleons is sufficient to form a black hole, then what prevents them from forming a black hole when they are at this overshot point in density, which should be more than sufficient for black hole formation? If nothing prevents them from collapsing all the way down to a black hole at this point, then what causes the supernova. It doesn't seem to be the rebound, because there can be no rebound from a black hole state. And the rest of the star material is on its merry way to falling into the black hole, not flying out into space.

Is it the acretion of the remaining material that heats up and gives off tremendous amounts of radiation before falling in?
 
turin said:
If the stable density of these nucleons is sufficient to form a black hole, then what prevents them from forming a black hole when they are at this overshot point in density, which should be more than sufficient for black hole formation?
AFAIK, it is NOT sufficient to form a black hole (but I may be mistaken).
 
turin said:
But after the fusion to iron, then the iron ash heats up to the point that photodesintigration sets in. This takes energy away from the iron ash core which inhibits its ability to support the rest of the star. The disintegrated core therefore collapses as a swarm of nucleons which recedes away from the outer layers of the star, essentially isolating itself for a (very) brief period. These nucleons have a stable density that can be supported by neutron degeneracy pressure. However, they are collapsing so fast that they overshoot this density. Here's where I am having trouble understanding:

If the stable density of these nucleons is sufficient to form a black hole, then what prevents them from forming a black hole when they are at this overshot point in density, which should be more than sufficient for black hole formation? If nothing prevents them from collapsing all the way down to a black hole at this point, then what causes the supernova. It doesn't seem to be the rebound, because there can be no rebound from a black hole state. And the rest of the star material is on its merry way to falling into the black hole, not flying out into space.

Is it the acretion of the remaining material that heats up and gives off tremendous amounts of radiation before falling in?
I'm typing on an answer to this but have to go out-of town tomorrow morning. The answer is easy enough, but it would take a long post to go through the steps. I may not get it together until I get back in 7-10 days. But, the other guys should have a go at it and maybe it will be resolved by then.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K