| Thread Closed |
adjoint operator |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb4-10, 03:42 AM | #1 |
|
|
adjoint operator
I recently teach myself linear algebra with Friedberg's textbook.
And I have a question about adjoint operator, which is on p.367. Definition Let T : V → W be a linear transformation where V and W are finite-dimensional inner product spaces with inner products <‧,‧> and <‧,‧>' respectively. A funtion T* : W → V is called an adjoint of T if <T(x),y>' = <x,T*(x)> for all x in V and y in W. Then ,my question is how to prove that there is a unique adjoint T* of T ? Can anyone give me some tips ? thanks^^ |
| Feb4-10, 04:02 AM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Assume that there is another adjoint transformation, let's say T**.
|
| Feb4-10, 05:07 AM | #3 |
|
|
To show that there exists such a function, let [tex]v_1, \ldots , v_n[/tex] be an orthonormal basis for V, so that [tex]x = \sum_i \langle x,v_i\rangle v_i[/tex] for any x in V then we have for all x in V and y in W:
[tex]\langle T(x), y\rangle ' = \langle T (\sum_i \langle x,v_i\rangle v_i ), y\rangle '[/tex] [tex] = \sum_i \langle x, v_i\rangle \langle T(v_i), y\rangle '[/tex] [tex] = \langle x, \sum_i \overline{ \langle T(v_i),y\rangle '} v_i\rangle [/tex] which is in the form that we'd like. Which shows that [tex]T^*(y) = \sum_i \overline{\langle T(v_i),y\rangle '} v_i[/tex] for all y in W works. |
| Feb4-10, 06:04 AM | #4 |
|
|
adjoint operator
really appreciate^^
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: adjoint operator
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Adjoint of an operator | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 1 | ||
| Adjoint of an operator | Advanced Physics Homework | 22 | ||
| adjoint operator | Quantum Physics | 9 | ||
| adjoint of an operator | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 8 | ||
| Adjoint of an operator | Introductory Physics Homework | 11 | ||