Why Dropping the Sqrt{1 + 1/x^4} dx Matters for Surface Area

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical reasoning behind dropping the term Sqrt{1 + 1/x^4} in the context of calculating surface area, particularly in relation to the concepts of finite volume and infinite surface area. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical proofs, and examples that illustrate these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Sqrt{1 + 1/x^4} is always greater than or equal to 1, suggesting it can be dropped from the integral when considering divergence.
  • Others argue that finite quantities can be excluded from limits or integration problems when approaching infinity.
  • One participant presents an example of a function (1/x^2) demonstrating that infinite perimeter can coexist with finite area, drawing a parallel to the surface area and volume discussion.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the reasoning behind dropping the root and requests further explanation.
  • Another participant describes a process of generating infinite length from a finite area, reinforcing the idea that finite volume can lead to infinite surface area.
  • One participant shares their attempt to graph a horn shape in Maple 8, indicating a need for assistance with the mathematical representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing levels of understanding regarding the dropping of the root term and the implications of finite volume versus infinite surface area. There is no consensus on the reasoning behind these mathematical decisions, and multiple viewpoints are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference external resources for clarification, indicating that there may be additional assumptions or definitions at play that are not fully explored in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in mathematical proofs, surface area calculations, and the relationship between volume and surface area in higher dimensions may find this discussion relevant.

woodysooner
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
ok I know how to solve for the volume no prob, but when you find the surface area, in all the proof they always drop the root, because something about being bigger than one

Sqrt{1 + 1/x^4} dx

can someone explain why they drop that, and how it's possible to have finite volume and infinite surface area.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I particularly don't understand your first question.

as for ur second question, it seems you have done some good research noticing the title of this post :)

you may want to look here first,
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/52017.html

in case anything abt is doubtful may be asked freely.

-- AI
 
That's the exact site i was on lol

Note that Sqrt{1 + 1/x^4} is always at least as big as 1, so we can drop it from the integral, and if the resulting integral diverges
to infinity.

this is on the site, and that what i was asking about, i remember doing these probs and we never ignored the root we always worked it out.
 
I haven't got a chance to read the actual proof, but what I do know is that when dealing with limits going to infinity, finite quantities have no relevance and can be excluded from any limit or integration problem.
 
why is it surprising that you can infinite surface area and finite volume? knock it down a dimension and consider 1/x^2 between 1 and infinity and bound below by the x axis. perimeter is infinite and area is finite...
 
GZA, can you say that again somehow and explain that' s kewl but i didint know that.
 
btw matt, what would that look like.
 
They droped [tex]\sqrt{1+x^4}[/tex] knowing that it is > 1. So Then it can be said that

[tex]\int_{1}^{\infty} 2 \pi \frac {1}{x} \sqrt {1+x^4} \geq \int_{1}^{\infty} 2 \pi \frac {1}{x}[/tex]

The right hand side diverges because of p-series so by comparison, the integral on the left diverges also.

Just wondering I am trying to graph the picture of the horn on Maple 8, I think I determined the equation to be [tex]\frac {1}{x^2}=y^2+z^2[/tex]. But Maple needs me to solve for z. So there is going to be some ugly square root. The horn looks pretty messed up from then. Anyone know what to do?
 
take a unit square which thus has unit area. Cut it in half and lay half of it down along the x axis. then cut the remaining half in half and lay the =resulting quarter down along the x axis. you now have a segment of length 2 units. Now go back to the remaining quarter of a square and cut it in half again, and lay the resulting half piece down along the x-axis next to the two previous pieces.

Do you see that you can continue this process forever, thus generating an infinite lonegth from a finite area? In the same way a finite volume can give rise to an infinite area.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K