Thinking Without Language: Problem Solving Inhibited?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Grimmus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thinking
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the nature of thought and problem-solving in the absence of language, considering how different forms of cognition, such as feelings and mental imagery, may influence understanding and reasoning. Participants examine the implications of thinking without words, referencing both human and animal cognition, as well as historical perspectives on language and consciousness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that thinking without language may involve feelings and mental images, rather than words, which are seen as convenient but not essential for thought.
  • One participant proposes that feelings can represent ideas and interact similarly to those ideas, potentially allowing for understanding without verbalization.
  • Another participant mentions an autistic individual who reportedly thinks in pictures, raising questions about the validity and implications of such cognitive processes.
  • A reference is made to Daniel Dennett's theory, which posits that consciousness is linked to language, suggesting that the ability to verbalize may enhance abstract thought.
  • Discussion includes the evolutionary perspective on Neanderthals and Homo Erectus, with some arguing that the lack of verbal communication may have limited Neanderthal cognitive abilities.
  • Concerns are raised about societal implications of discussing genetic differences among ethnic groups, with some participants advocating for objective scientific inquiry regardless of social sensitivities.
  • One participant mentions the possibility of achieving a state of thought without words through meditation, although this state is described as tenuous and easily lost.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the role of language in thought, with no consensus reached on whether problem-solving is inhibited without language. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of different cognitive processes and their validity.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on anecdotal evidence or personal experiences, and there are unresolved questions about the nature of instinct versus volition in cognition across species. The discussion touches on sensitive topics related to genetics and ethnicity, which may influence participants' willingness to engage fully with certain ideas.

The Grimmus
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
When we think we think using words for the most part maybe with an imgae or two for color but mostly we think in words. How dose one go about thinking without a language like an infiante or another anmial. is problem solving inhibted ?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I believe that feelings that represent things and ideas interact in a way much like those things and ideas interact, and that these feelings are the true language of the mind, and so we can understand how things react without words. Have you ever understood something without words? It's like that. I believe feelings can go even farther into thought than words can, and are more easily managed. Furthermore, I think that all words have feelings attatched to them and that is how we are able to think with words.
 
Without words, yes we would think in terms of feelings, mental pictures, sounds etc. We think in words mostly now because they are the most convenient abstract medium to use. Since words are generally just a shorthand way or representing some previous experience, its easier to think the word, than it is to think the experience.

AS such, out brain can throw words around willy nilly.
 
It would probably interest you, The Grimmus, to know that Daniel Dennett's theory of consciousness doesn't allow for a fully developed consciousness, separate from one that contains some form of "language". It is the primitive languages that helped the human mind evolve many of it's current conscious abilities.
 
Originally posted by Another God
Since words are generally just a shorthand way or representing some previous experience, its easier to think the word, than it is to think the experience.

I seem to recall recently hearing about an autistic(?) woman who claims to think in pictures rather than words. She claimed she had to replay scenes (past experiences) in her head when figuring out how to deal with new situations.

Not sure how much credibility that claim has (I can't quite imagine how that would work).

As for animals, let's not forget instinct (hard-wired responses to external stimuli). The degree to which instinct vs. volition plays in each species (including human) behavior is an interesting subject...which I know little about. :smile:
 
This is a good question. For many years scientists had wondered why it was that the Neanderthal who was physically stronger and had a larger brain than the Homo Erectus was the species of the two that became extinct. Eventually, they came to the conclusion that it was due to the fact that the Neanderthal did not have the ability to verbalize that the Homo Erectus did. Essentially, they believe that the lack of ability to talk limited the level of absract thought that the Neanderthal was able to attain; thus, giving the Homo Erectus the evolutionary advantage for dominating that eco-system.

However, I recently watched a show on the Discovery Channel in which a current theory says that the Neanderthal inter-breeded with he Homo Erectus and eventually faded out through. Many archeologists are suggesting that Europeans are actually part Neanderthal. However, this is a very touchy issue. It is not benefical for the development of our society to focus on the genetic differences between different ethnic groups. So, try not to think about these last statements too much.

eNtRopY
 
Originally posted by eNtRopY
However, this is a very touchy issue. It is not benefical for the development of our society to focus on the genetic differences between different ethnic groups. So, try not to think about these last statements too much.
That really annoys me. I very much dislike it when emotional crap, and personal issues within society get in the way of meaningful research. I don't care if society has issues with discussing ethnic groupings, if we are trying to understand something objective through science, then let it happen...let science enquire, let us find the answer, and let the answer be true. If europeans are half neanderthal, so what? Does it really change anything?

grrrr at the stupidity of people.
 
Another God, I couldn't agree with you more.

Here's an article on the hapmap, which looks like being the new battleground on these issues: http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/000789.html
 
Originally posted by The Grimmus
When we think we think using words for the most part maybe with an imgae or two for color but mostly we think in words. How dose one go about thinking without a language like an infiante or another anmial. is problem solving inhibted ?

It is possible, using meditation and meditative techniques, to get into a state of consciousness where words are not part of your thoughts. It's a tenious state, lost easily.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
98
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K