Register to reply

How women think

by 300072507
Tags: women
Share this thread:
Klockan3
#19
Mar13-10, 05:47 PM
P: 614
Quote Quote by Evo View Post
Complex as in sexual desire is not the only criteria?
Yeah, roughly like that, since we are talking extrapolated generalizations.
epenguin
#20
Mar13-10, 07:03 PM
HW Helper
epenguin's Avatar
P: 1,991
I have just recovered from my wastepaper basket a copy of The Economist (5 Aug 2006) which I had thrown there in a clearup today, a rundown on scientific studies of differences between male and female psychology. I had thrown it out without copying because there are hardly any interesting differences reported.

Just one was "contrary to popular myth, men and women are equally good at navigating" which I found hard to believe. However it made more sense with the explanation "But this is another example of a task in which the sexes take different paths to the same destination. Women tend to rely on remembering landmarks, whereas men rely on their geometric skills to work out direction and distance." In fact I have learnt to never take directions to a place from a woman - that usually requires about three supplementary phone calls. I rather say "Just tell me the postcode or street name and I'll find it."

The other interesting difference was that women were less aggressive in dropping bombs on an attacker in a videogame. As we would expect. Except that that was only when they thought someone was watching - when they thought they were anonymous they were more aggressive than the men.

I think you can still find the article at e.g. http://www.cnblogs.com/phinecos/arch...20/481729.html
Moonbear
#21
Mar13-10, 07:33 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Moonbear's Avatar
P: 12,270
Quote Quote by 300072507 View Post
Yesterday I got into a discussion with a girl from school about how women are generally more emotional thinkers than men. What mean is that they base their decisions more heavily on how they feel 'in their heart' rather than possibly looking at the big picture. It's more of a personal (dare I say selfish?) kind of thing. She agreed with me, until I put the example of how women vote. Politicians can occasionally win elections because they are very attractive and good with kids. I would attribute this kind of effect to the female vote. Now, I'm not saying that men don't make stupid decisions, but they don't usually base their vote on how cool they think their candidate is.
If you want to prove you're a more rational thinker, provide examples of those politicians who have won elections because they are more attractive and good with kids rather than because they were more qualified than the other candidate, and THEN show that it was the women's vote who swayed that choice.

Anyway, she still didn't buy my argument (possibly because she's a lady haha) so I told her that I would come back to her after the weekend with a better one. Any suggestions?
So, you don't actually have an argument? And you're hoping for us to provide you with one? That doesn't sound very rational to me at all, definitely more emotional.

I'm pretty firm in my beliefs about this generalisation of women
Pretty firm in your beliefs, but you still have no foundation for those beliefs, or else you wouldn't be here asking us to provide an argument for you. Once again, this is sounding very emotional.

- probably because my mother is an extremely rational thinker
And your best example is of a woman who is RATIONAL, not emotional?

[quote], so growing up I was never around 'that' kind of girl, and now it REALLY pops out to me.[quote]
So you notice that people are irrational in their thinking, only because they stand out in contrast to your previous experience? And that is supposed to justify somehow that women are less rational? Now it's starting to sound like a bit of confirmation bias as well.

I'd like to stress, though, that this isn't meant to be some kind of jab at women.
Really? How did you think it would be interpreted?

You're all wonderful and men have their flaws too.
More so than you know.

Everything you're trying to argue really runs contrary to evidence on things such as risk-taking behavior. Women tend to not take as many risks as men, even when it can be a hindrance to their progress, career, or financial success. Men are more likely to take a risk based on a "gut feeling" than women who want to analyze everything and be very sure that something is going to be a safe investment.

Of course, that all flies out the window when men get married. Then it gets very hard to compare decision making between the sexes, because as we all know, men don't get to make the decisions once they are married.
rewebster
#22
Mar13-10, 07:44 PM
P: 880
Quote Quote by 300072507 View Post
Anyway, she still didn't buy my argument (possibly because she's a lady haha) so I told her that I would come back to her after the weekend with a better one. Any suggestions?
do you want to win the argument or get laid?
magpies
#23
Mar13-10, 07:53 PM
P: 229
Ya if you dont come up with a better argument you can basically assume she is going to think your stupid for the rest of your life.
DanP
#24
Mar13-10, 07:59 PM
P: 630
Moonbear's post reminded me of this:

TheStatutoryApe
#25
Mar13-10, 09:03 PM
TheStatutoryApe's Avatar
P: 1,550
Quote Quote by 300072507 View Post
She agreed with me, until I put the example of how women vote. Politicians can occasionally win elections because they are very attractive and good with kids. I would attribute this kind of effect to the female vote. Now, I'm not saying that men don't make stupid decisions, but they don't usually base their vote on how cool they think their candidate is.
Studies have shown that people in general (that is both male and female) react positively to the attractiveness of a person. The "cool" guy is also probably a good looking guy in most circumstances.


I'm pretty firm in my beliefs about this generalisation of women - probably because my mother is an extremely rational thinker, so growing up I was never around 'that' kind of girl, and now it REALLY pops out to me. I'd like to stress, though, that this isn't meant to be some kind of jab at women. You're all wonderful and men have their flaws too.
Females are typically treated this way all through out their lives and it conditions many of them to behave this way. On the other side of the coin men are often conditioned to "be a man" by not allowing their emotions to get the better of them.
Brian_C
#26
Mar14-10, 11:28 AM
P: 261
Women think?
lisab
#27
Mar14-10, 11:30 AM
Mentor
lisab's Avatar
P: 3,008
Quote Quote by Brian_C View Post
Women think?
Lonely much?
DanP
#28
Mar14-10, 11:36 AM
P: 630
Quote Quote by Brian_C View Post
Women think?
Tickets on sale again.
magpies
#29
Mar14-10, 12:01 PM
P: 229
I once asked a woman what her thoughts where like... never will I forget that awful day.
rewebster
#30
Mar14-10, 12:20 PM
P: 880
http://www.lovefatedestiny.com/howwomenthink.htm
Dembadon
#31
Mar14-10, 01:06 PM
PF Gold
Dembadon's Avatar
P: 641

Here we see 300072507. Notice the position shark 30256 (Moonbear) has taken.
DanP
#32
Mar14-10, 01:38 PM
P: 630
rhody
#33
Mar14-10, 02:05 PM
PF Gold
rhody's Avatar
P: 765
If you really are serious in wanting to know how women think, I recommend, "The Female Brain", by Louann Brizendine, published 2006, after 5 years or so of research. The Reference section is over 150 pages long !!! Yes, folks she did her homework on this one and then some.

NY Times Review

This thread has a little schizo feel to it, from silly to serious, so anyone who wishes can turn it back to silly. Just thought I would add my two cents. I found the book interesting, and honest, anyone else out there read it too ? Opinions ?

Rhody...
GeorginaS
#34
Mar14-10, 02:26 PM
GeorginaS's Avatar
P: 380
Quote Quote by rhody View Post
If you really are serious in wanting to know how women think, I recommend, "The Female Brain", by Louann Brizendine, published 2006, after 5 years or so of research. The Reference section is over 150 pages long !!! Yes, folks she did her homework on this one and then some.

NY Times Review

This thread has a little schizo feel to it, from silly to serious, so anyone who wishes can turn it back to silly. Just thought I would add my two cents. I found the book interesting, and honest, anyone else out there read it too ? Opinions ?

Rhody...
That New York Times review is hardly a strong recommendation for taking the time to read that book, Rhody.
Math Is Hard
#35
Mar14-10, 02:53 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Math Is Hard's Avatar
P: 4,922
Quote Quote by 300072507 View Post
.. Politicians can occasionally win elections because they are very attractive and good with kids. I would attribute this kind of effect to the female vote. Now, I'm not saying that men don't make stupid decisions, but they don't usually base their vote on how cool they think their candidate is..
I'm sure there's a wealth of research out there on this topic. You might want to peruse some before making up your mind. (Unless, of course, you prefer "going with your gut" over taking the analytical approach.)

I came across this abstract of a study on facial appearances of presidential candidates. I thought it was intriguing:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18974841

Male and female voters judged a series of male and female political candidates on how competent, dominant, attractive and approachable they seemed based on their facial appearance. Then they saw a series of pairs of political candidates and decided which politician they would vote for in a hypothetical election for President of the United States. Results indicate that both gender of voter and candidate affect the kinds of facial impressions that predict voting behavior. All voters are likely to vote for candidates who appear more competent. However, male candidates that appear more approachable and female candidates who appear more attractive are more likely to win votes. In particular, men are more likely to vote for attractive female candidates whereas women are more likely to vote for approachable male candidates.
I'd like to read the entire paper, because the abstract doesn't appear to reveal what the top choice was for the male and female voting groups. For instance, did the men prefer attractive females over all the available male and female candidate choices (of equal competence)? Or were attractive females only the top choice when choosing only among the competent female candidates? I'll have to dig this paper up when I get back to work and can access journal articles.

Happily, it does seem to suggest that the appearance of competence is the most influential attribute for voters of either sex.

I think this could be a very interesting thread if there is any hope of keeping it at a somewhat mature level and discussing actual research data. Otherwise, it's just "One young man's opinion on how women think" followed by a bunch of lame pot shots. I know this is General Discussion, but let's not sink to the level of AOL chat.
D H
#36
Mar14-10, 02:54 PM
Mentor
P: 15,201
Quote Quote by Moonbear View Post
Of course, that all flies out the window when men get married. Then it gets very hard to compare decision making between the sexes, because as we all know, men don't get to make the decisions once they are married.
Hey! I resent that remark -- I think. Just to make sure, let me double-check with my better half.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
To All Women of PF: General Discussion 23
Men vs. Women General Discussion 20
Women and diy General Discussion 16
Women Have Been Right All Along General Discussion 22