Why are muons called mu-mesons if they're leptons?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter daveed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Muons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the terminology of muons being referred to as mu-mesons despite being classified as leptons. It explores historical context, naming conventions, and the evolution of particle physics terminology.

Discussion Character

  • Historical
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the term "meson" originally referred to particles with mass between that of electrons and protons, deriving from the Greek word for "midway thing."
  • One participant explains that the confusion arose in the early 1940s when Yukawa predicted a particle to carry the nuclear force, leading to the detection of a particle with a mass around 103 MeV/c², initially labeled as a meson.
  • Another participant mentions that the term "mu-meson" persisted due to historical confusion, despite the realization that the muon is a lepton and not a carrier of the strong force.
  • There is a reference to the evolution of terminology in particle physics, including the transition from "mesotron" to "meson" and the distinction between muons and pions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the historical context of the terminology but express differing views on the implications of this naming convention and its relevance to current particle classifications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the historical evolution of particle names and the potential for confusion in terminology, particularly regarding the classification of particles based on mass and their roles in particle physics.

daveed
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
why are muons called mu-mesons if they're leptons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because historically the word meson meant a particle whose mass was intermediate between the electron and the proton. From the Greek for "midway thing". This was long before Gell-Mann thought of quarks. Only as the standard model was being put together, about 20 years later, did the present meaning of meson arise.
 
On the topic of misnomers... Isospin was once called isotopic spin. A less misleading name would be isobaric spin. The tacit agreement seems to be to just shorten the word to isospin.
 
daveed said:
why are muons called mu-mesons if they're leptons?

As someone else mentioned, the word "meson" comes from "middle one" because the first discovered had a mass intermediate between the masses of the electron on one hand and the masses of the proton and neutron on the other hand.

The link between "muons" and "mesons" is due to a confusion that lasted several years in the early 40's. Yukawa had predicted a particle that would carry the nuclear force between nucleons, a particle of a mass a little more than 100 MeV/c^2. Physicists soon detected a particle of about that mass in cosmic rays. It was then called the meson (well, mesotron first then the name meson was adopted). It had a mass of about 103 MeV/c^2. And then they found one more (about 135 MeV/c^2), and then more and more!

It was later realized that the first meson was *not* the carrier of the strong force. It was a new lepton (prompting Rabi to ask "who ordered *that*?). That's what we now call the muon. The particles near 135 MeV/c^2 (there are 3 of them, with charges 0,e,-e) are the pions and these are the particles predicted by Yukawa.

So it's for historical reasons that you sometimes see the name "mu-meson", because of the confusion between the muon and the mesons.

Pat
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K