How Many Shuffles for a Deck of Cards?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter daveed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cards
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the number of times a deck of 52 cards needs to be shuffled to be considered "well shuffled," exploring different shuffling techniques and their implications for randomness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the definition of "well shuffled" and the specific shuffling techniques that should be used.
  • One participant mentions that "The Riffle" technique requires at least seven shuffles to achieve randomness, referencing a source for further information.
  • Another participant notes that performing eight "perfect riffle shuffles" returns the deck to its original order, describing the process of a perfect riffle shuffle in detail.
  • There is a discussion about the practical challenges of achieving a perfect riffle shuffle, suggesting that some randomness is necessary due to human error.
  • One participant challenges the assertion about the number of shuffles, suggesting that the order of the perfect riffle shuffle is indeed eight, and provides a mathematical breakdown of the shuffle's permutation cycle structure.
  • A participant expresses frustration over a mistake in their calculations regarding the card positions after shuffling.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the number of shuffles required for a well-shuffled deck, with some asserting seven and others discussing the implications of eight shuffles. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact number of shuffles needed and the effectiveness of various techniques.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference mathematical concepts related to permutations and cycle structures, but there are unresolved details regarding the assumptions behind the definitions of "well shuffled" and the effectiveness of different shuffling techniques.

daveed
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
at least how many times does a deck of 52 cards need to be shuffled for it to be considered well shuffled?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
daveed said:
at least how many times does a deck of 52 cards need to be shuffled for it to be considered well shuffled?

What do you mean by well shuffled?
also
What shuffling technique do you suggest?
 
I once heard that the technique called "The Riffle", where the deck is cut in two piles and the cards are shuffled together on a table, where a few cards from one side fall, then a few from the other etc. needs to be done seven times to ensure randomness.

Edit

Just found this good site for you:
http://www.encyclopedia4u.com/s/shuffling-playing-cards.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On a related note, if you perform 8 "perfect rifle shuffles" to a deck of 52 cards, it ends up in the exact same order you started with. How to describe a "perfect rifle shuffle"- split the deck perfectly into 2 piles, the 26 top cards and the 26 bottom cards. As you rifle them together, you first put down one card from the bottom pile, then one card from the top pile, then one from the bottom, etc.

This is pretty near impossible to do quickly in practice, you first have to split the deck in half perfectly then have the cards fall alternately one from each hand. The moral is there has to be some "randomness" to your shuffling tecnique, such as clumsy fingers, or maybe greasy fingers from hot wings.
 
If you believe that, I suggest you actually try it.
 
Hurkyl said:
If you believe that, I suggest you actually try it.

Already have years ago. Do you not believe it at all or is 8 wrong (could be 7 or 9, but I'm remembering 8)? You can think of any shuffle as an element of the group of permutations of order 52. So if you keep performing the exact same shuffle over and over again, you eventually get back to where you started. What seems suprising at first is a perfect riffle shuffle has order only 8. This is less suprising when you right down it's decomposition as a product of disjoint cycles.

It takes the sequence 1, 2, ..., 51, 52 to
1,27,2,28,...,25,51,26,52

So we get

(1)(2, 3, 5, 9, 17, 33, 14, 27)(4, 7, 13, 25, 49, 46, 40, 28)(6, 11, 21, 41, 30, 8, 15, 29)(10, 19, 37, 22, 43, 34, 16, 31)(12, 23, 45, 38, 24, 47, 42, 32)(18, 35)(20, 39, 26, 51, 50, 48, 44, 36)(52)

Hmm, guess it was 8 after all. I didn't intend to write it all out, but it was easy enough. If n is less than or equal to 26, n->2n-1. If n is greater than 26, n->2n-52.
 
Off by one errors suck. :( I placed card #2 winding up somewhere other than spot 2 at the end.
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K