What is the origin of Boltzmann's constant?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Galileo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Origin
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the origin and significance of Boltzmann's constant, exploring its relationship with temperature and energy, its derivation from statistical mechanics, and its historical context. Participants examine both empirical and theoretical aspects of the constant, as well as its implications in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Boltzmann's constant is essentially an experimental value derived from the ideal gas law and statistical mechanics.
  • Others propose that while Boltzmann's constant can be derived from other physical constants, calculating its value from first principles is currently too complex.
  • One participant mentions that Boltzmann's constant is dependent on the chosen temperature scale, suggesting that it could be considered an historical artifact.
  • Another participant elaborates on the historical context of Boltzmann's work, linking the constant to the statistical interpretation of entropy and the kinetic theory of gases.
  • Some contributions highlight the significance of Boltzmann's constant in bridging microscopic particle behavior with macroscopic thermodynamic properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether Boltzmann's constant is primarily an experimental value or a derived constant. There is no consensus on the ease or difficulty of calculating its value from first principles, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding its historical significance and implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to the equipartition theorem and the definition of the thermodynamic temperature scale, which may introduce additional assumptions and dependencies that are not fully explored.

Galileo
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,980
Reaction score
7
I know that measurements have established the following
empirical laws for the ideal gas, contained in some closed volume:

-Keeping pressure and temperature constant, the volume is proportional to the number of moles.
-The volume varies inversely with pressure.
-The pressure is proportional to the absolute temperature.

These three relations can be put in an equation, called the ideal-gas equation:
[tex]pV=nRT[/tex]

where the constant of proportionality is the gas constant.
As far as I have understood, R is an experimentally measured quantity:

[tex]R=8.314510(70) J/mol\cdot K[/tex]
when we want to work with the number of particles instead of moles (which we often do) we define:
[tex]k=\frac{R}{N_A}[/tex]
where [itex]N_A[/itex] is Avogadro's number and k is called the Boltzmann constant.
The gas equation then becomes:
[tex]pV=NkT[/tex]
with N the number of particles.

These laws can be 'derived' or 'proven' from statistical mechanics.
When applying statistical considerations to the ideal gas and derive the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution we end up with two constants.
One has to be found by normalization to give the right number of particles and the other one is found by comparing with the above gas equation and they find the Boltzmann constant (times temperature).

So am I correct that the Boltmann constant is (essentially) an experimental value? It occurs to me this constant should be derivable by statistical methods as well.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Galileo said:
So am I correct that the Boltmann constant is (essentially) an experimental value? It occurs to me this constant should be derivable by statistical methods as well.

You might want to take a look at the Wikipedia article on Boltzmann's constant


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann%27s_constant

In principle, the Boltzmann constant is a derived physical constant, as its value is determined by other physical constants. However, calculating the Boltzmann constant from first principles is far too complex to be done with current knowledge.

So why is it so hard to compute the value of Boltzmann's constant? Boltmznn's constant relates the thermodynamic temperature scale to energy. Let's look at the SI definition of the thermodynamic temperature scale

kelvin The kelvin, unit of thermodynamic temperature, is the fraction 1/273.16 of the thermodynamic temperature of the triple point of water.

We know by the equipartition theorem that every degree of freedom of water at the triple point has an energy of
[tex]\frac {1}{2} K 273.16 degrees[/tex]

But computing this value of energy accurately from first principles is not currently within our capabilities.
 
Boltzmann's constant relates energy and temperature, and so is dependent upon our chosen temperature scale. In a sense, it is an historical artefact. The common scale is one in which the boiling and freezing points of water at atmospheric pressure are separated by 100 units. If, on the other hand, we choose a temperature scale that is basically the same as our energy units, we would not have a Boltzmann's constant, i.e. k=1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
krab said:
Boltzmann's constant relates energy and temperature, and so is dependent upon our chosen temperature scale. In a sense, it is an historical artefact. The common scale is one in which the boiling and freezing points of water at atmospheric pressure are separated by 100 units. If, on the other hand, we choose a temperature scale that is basically the same as our energy units, we would not have a Boltzmann's constant, i.e. k=1.
By this point of view, it seems any particular dimensional constant is an artifact, since it could be unitary.

Boltzmann's constant (symbol: k) is a fundamental physical constant that relates the average kinetic energy of particles in a gas to the temperature of that gas. It plays a crucial role in statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and the understanding of the behavior of matter at the microscopic level. The constant is named after the Austrian physicist Ludwig Boltzmann, who made significant contributions to the field of statistical mechanics.

The origin of Boltzmann's constant can be traced back to Boltzmann's work in the late 19th century, where he sought to provide a theoretical foundation for the principles of thermodynamics. His work involved the statistical interpretation of entropy and the development of the kinetic theory of gases. In particular, Boltzmann introduced the concept of entropy as a measure of the number of microstates associated with a particular macrostate of a system.

Boltzmann's constant emerges when he related the entropy (S) of a system to the number of microstates (W) corresponding to that macrostate and the fundamental constants of nature:

S = k * ln(W),

where:

  • S is the entropy,
  • k is Boltzmann's constant,
  • ln represents the natural logarithm,
  • W is the number of microstates.
This equation, now known as the Boltzmann entropy formula, is a fundamental concept in statistical mechanics. Boltzmann's constant was introduced to link the macroscopic properties of a system (entropy) to the microscopic behavior of its constituent particles. It allows us to bridge the gap between the statistical behavior of individual particles and the macroscopic properties of matter.

Boltzmann's work had a profound impact on our understanding of the behavior of gases, the concept of temperature, and the laws of thermodynamics. His constant, k, serves as a critical bridge between the microscopic world of particles and the macroscopic world of thermodynamics, and it remains a fundamental constant in the field of physics and chemistry. The value of Boltzmann's constant is approximately 1.380649 × 10^(-23) joules per kelvin (J/K).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
10K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K