Why Inverted Candles Don't Burn: Explained

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 7bear
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the phenomenon of inverted candles and the reasons they do not burn effectively when positioned upside down. Participants explore various factors influencing combustion, including oxygen availability and wax behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that inverted candles do not burn due to a lack of oxygen in the combustion reaction.
  • Others propose that the dripping wax extinguishes the flame by smothering the wick.
  • A participant questions whether the candle will not light at all or simply not remain lit, agreeing that lack of oxygen is a significant issue.
  • One participant mentions that in microgravity, flames behave differently, indicating a potential for the inverted candle to burn in that environment.
  • A suggestion is made to conduct an experiment with an inverted candle to observe the results.
  • Another participant introduces a related concept of a candle oscillator, proposing an experiment involving burning a candle at both ends and questioning the nature of its oscillation period.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reasons for the inverted candle's failure to burn, with some focusing on oxygen availability and others on wax behavior. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing explanations presented.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the conditions under which the candle is tested, such as the presence of oxygen and the effects of microgravity, are not fully explored. The implications of the proposed candle oscillator experiment are also not detailed.

7bear
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Why don't the inverted candle fire??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it does when you light up the opposite end! :wink:

I think it might be because the dripping wax extinguishes the flame.
 
yes, lack of oxygen in the combustion reaction. The wax smothers the wick and puts out the flame.
 
7bear said:
Why don't the inverted candle fire??

Have never tried the experiment, are you saying it won't light at all? Or simply that it won't remain lit? In either case, I would agree that lack of oxygen is the problem. In the latter case, wax smothers the flame. In the former, perhaps the body of the candle is blocking the upward flow of air away from the flame, preventing fresh air from flowing in.
 
but... since in space where there is microgravity, the flame goes in all directions. I'm going to try the upsidedown candle experiment and report to you the results... if I get around to it
 
Crumbles, how did you become a PF contributor?
 
Mk said:
Crumbles, how did you become a PF contributor?

Make a contribution to PF by clicking on https://www.physicsforums.com/subscriptions.php and you can become a PF contributor! :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ahhh, I see, I don't think I'll pay
 
Have you tried the candle oscillator (see diagram, below)? Start with a needle thrust through the candle's center, perpendicular to the candle and with ends resting on fulcra. Burn the candle at both its ends, and watch it see-saw. Would its period be approximately linear or nonlinear?

~====\====~
 
  • #10
In cyberspace.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
676
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
24K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K