## The probability distribution function of...

I've been practicing on how to get the probability distribution/density functions of certain random variables by solving some questions in my book. I cam accross this particular problem, and though, It seems easy, the answer does not comply with what I got (or simply I got the wrong answer.)

Urn I and Urn II each has two red chips and two white chips. Two chips are drawn from each urn without replacement. Let $$X_1$$ be the number of red chips taken from Urn I, $$X_2$$ be the number of red chips taken from Urn II. Find the
$$p_X_3(k)$$ where $$X_3 = X_1 + X_2$$

I got the answer when $$X_3 = 0$$ so thought I go with the case where $$X_3 = 1$$ and this can happen if either $$X_1 = 1$$ and $$X_2 = 0$$ or vice versa$$P(X_3 = 1) = \left ( \left (\begin{array}{cc}2 \\ 1 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array}{cc}2 \\ 1\end{array} \right) / \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 \\ 2\end{array} \right) \right) \right \cdot \left ( \left (\begin{array}{cc}2 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array}{cc}2 \\ 2\end{array} \right) / \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 \\ 2\end{array} \right) \right) \cdot 2$$

since you can have $$\left (\begin{array}{cc}2 \\ 1 \end{array} \right)$$ ways of getting 1 red chip and $$\left (\begin{array}{cc}2 \\ 1 \end{array} \right)$$ ways of getting the white chip out of $$\left (\begin{array}{cc}4 \\ 2 \end{array} \right)$$ ways of getting 2 chips from a set of 4 chips from Urn I and for Urn II there are 2 choose 0 ways of getting 0 red and 2 choose 2 ways of getting 2 white chips, so you multiply their probabilities, then multiply by two since the cases of Urn I and Urn II can interchange. I got a probability of 2/9, but when I referred to the answer at the appendix of the book the answer should be 2/90. Am I missing something did I misinterpret the question or is my computation wrong?

 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> Front-row seats to climate change>> Attacking MRSA with metals from antibacterial clays>> New formula invented for microscope viewing, substitutes for federally controlled drug
 Recognitions: Gold Member There is going to be 6 ways for the first urn and 6 for the second urn, so that gives us 36 choices. Thus probability 2/90 is impossible. To start from the begining: If we draw a red on the first draw, the chances is 2/4, to draw a red a second time is now 1/3, thus two reds are 1/6. Similarly for two whites from the same urn. This leaves a 2/3 chance that we will draw both a red and a white from the same urn. To check the work we see that all cases must add to 1. 0 Red = 1/6 from urn one, 1/6 from urn 2 = 1/36 1 red = 2/3 from one, 1/6 from the second or visa versa: 4/18 = 2/9. 2 Red = 2/3 X 2/3 = 4/9. 3 red, same as 1 red = 2/9. 4 red same as 0 red = 1/36. Thus checking our work we have a total of 1/36 + 2/9 +4/9 + 2/9 + 1/36 = 17/18. WHAT WENT WRONG? Well, there is another way you can draw two red, that is none from the first urn and two from the second, or visa versa; giving 2/36 to add to the case of 2 reds.
 I knew it! 2/9 was the correct answer. And those were the same answers I got from solving that problem. But for some odd reason, the appendix of the book gave these answers: Red = 1/6 from urn one, 1/6 from urn 2 = 1/36 1 red = 2/3 from one, 1/6 from the second or visa versa: 4/18 = 2/90. 2 Red = 2/3 X 2/3 = 1/20. 3 red, same as 1 red = 2/90. 4 red same as 0 red = 1/36. As you can see, the book added an extra zero to those probabilities that from 1 red to 3 red. I cant believe it. The book made a typo error ^_^;; thanx for the clarification on the cases btw ^_^