New revolutionary theory explaining every thing about black hole

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aekanshchumber
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature and definition of black holes, exploring alternative theories and interpretations of their formation and characteristics. Participants express skepticism about current models and seek to refine or challenge existing definitions, touching on concepts such as gravitational forces, the event horizon, and the implications of mass loss during supernova events.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Aekansh proposes that the current definition of black holes is counterintuitive, questioning how a less massive object can exert a stronger gravitational force than a more massive one, and suggests that his ideas involve time travel and the Einstein-Rosen Bridge.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to hear Aekansh's ideas on black holes, indicating disagreement with the current definition and seeking further explanation.
  • A participant describes black holes as regions where matter is extremely condensed, suggesting that while the matter is not "infinitely" small, there is a definitive path after crossing the event horizon.
  • One participant asserts that black holes form when gravity overcomes the neutron degeneracy limit, arguing that the breakdown of mathematical models does not imply a breakdown of physical reality.
  • Aekansh questions the explanation of black hole formation from the core of a star post-supernova, asking how a less massive core can exert a greater gravitational force than the original star.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition and understanding of black holes, with no consensus reached. Some challenge the current models while others defend them, indicating an ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in current definitions and models, particularly regarding the relationship between mass and gravitational force, as well as the implications of mass loss during supernova events. These discussions remain unresolved.

aekanshchumber
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Dear Friends,
from some time in the past i have been working on the black hole mystery. and i figured out some ideas about black hole's creation. the present defination does not seen to be acceptable to comman sence, as how can a less massive object strong gravitationalforce than a much more massive object, as the present defination sugest. so figured it out that how could it can be possibe in my ideas time travel according to Einstein-Rosen Bridge,end of the universe are also explained. but the problem is i want tofully conferm these ideas befor presenting it. kindly send me any information you think present defination of black hole doesnot prove or any thing you thinkis helpful to solve it.

regards
Aekansh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be helpful if you would proofread your note. It is full of spelling errors and the punctuation makes it almost unreadable.
 
I have my own definition of a black hole. I do not agree with the current definition or model governing the phenomenon. I would like to hear your idea of how a black hole works. If you could, post it here or PM me. I'd appreciate your explanation.
 
Let's see if I can word this right...

Lots of stuff gets clustered in one spot, makes lots of gravity, and makes other stuff want to be in that spot. The matter in a black hole is condensed to the extreme, but is not "infinitely" small. There's only one way to go after you pass the event horizon.
 
A black hole is simple to define. When the force of gravity overwhelms the neutron degeneracy limit, a black hole forms. That does not seem very hard to understand. Just because our math breaks down at that point does not mean physical reality breaks down. Obviously, it does not. We observe a universe that permits both black holes and our inability to understand them [at least to our satisfaction].
 
to all of you,
Every one is saying that a black hole is created due to intence gravitational force of the remaining core of the star after supernova, but will anyone please explain to me that hoe could a less massive core of a star can exert much more force than the parent star with a mass greater than the black hole as during supernova it lost a huge amount of mass as energy and space dust.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
9K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K