Register to reply

Microscope field of view & depth of field/focus (confocal microscopy)

Share this thread:
ponjavic
#1
Apr21-10, 07:46 AM
P: 226
Hi

I am trying to run a FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching) experiment but I am struggling a little bit. For those not exposed to the technique it involves, for example, bleaching a spot in a specimen that is fluorescing rendering that spot dark in contrast.

I have two separate beams going through my microscope which I suppose can be considered as a lens.

One beam is collimated and almost fills the lens. The other beam is diverging as to illuminate the surroundings to contrast with the dark central spot.

The reason why I'm even posing a question is that using a very thin specimen (<1 micron) I have no problems bleaching and identifying the spot. Once I have something larger (<100 microns) I am unable to do it.

This is my theory but I would like to back it up:

The bleach spot is obviously smaller than the depth of my channel. The illumination beam causes the dye to fluoresce above and below the bleach spot not allowing me to observe it. The solution to this would be using a confocal setup.

I've calculated the depth of focus to be approximately 10microns but I don't know if this is the depth of focus of what I can see (probably is) or if it's the depth of focus of what I am bleaching or if these are the same (should be I suppose but then I shouldn't be having problems).

Any input or if you want me to clarify something is welcome.

Aleks

Edit:
I also don't understand why a collimated laser beam when focused on a surface only covers about 5% of the field of view (as shown in the diagram the bleach spot is much smaller than the field of view).

Edit2:
Ok I just realized that focal point != field of view. The field of view will depend on where the binoculars are in relation to the objective. As my field of view is much larger than my focal point, so should my depth of view be much larger than the depth of focus (excuse the terminology) and thus the bleach spot will not be seen.
Attached Thumbnails
physics.jpg  
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists discuss quantum pigeonhole principle
First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives
The first supercomputer simulations of 'spin?orbit' forces between neutrons and protons in an atomic nucleus
Andy Resnick
#2
Apr21-10, 09:32 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,510
Nikon's 'microscopyU' page is excellent- here's a few pages to get you started:

http://www.microscopyu.com/articles/...ielddepth.html

http://www.microscopyu.com/references/frap.html
ponjavic
#3
Apr21-10, 09:48 AM
P: 226
Quote Quote by Andy Resnick View Post
Nikon's 'microscopyU' page is excellent- here's a few pages to get you started:

http://www.microscopyu.com/articles/...ielddepth.html

http://www.microscopyu.com/references/frap.html
Thanks Andy, I've read all of it though.

I have yet to read about a comparison between depth of view and bleach depth. I find it very strange to read about FRAP without and with a confocal setup. The only way I could see the non confocal approach working would be with a very thin specimen.

I am just trying to visualize the hourglass the microscope allows me to see in comparison to the hourglass produced by my bleaching beam.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Depth of Field needed for Fraunhofer Pattern General Physics 1
Bright field microscopy General Physics 2
How can I control or focus a magnetic field Electrical Engineering 0
Microscope to view sample in focus with a completely relaxed eye Introductory Physics Homework 3
Physical explanation for camera DOF (depth of field) General Physics 3