Hamilton's principle and Lagrangian mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the historical development of Hamilton's principle and Lagrangian mechanics, exploring the relationships and differences between Lagrange's equations and Hamilton's approach. Participants examine the origins of these concepts and the contributions of various mathematicians in the context of variational principles.

Discussion Character

  • Historical
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Lagrange's equations are sometimes derived from Hamilton's principle, raising questions about the historical timeline of these ideas.
  • Another participant speculates that Lagrange may not have realized his equations minimized a variational integral, suggesting a possible gap in understanding during his time.
  • A third participant outlines the historical progression from Maupertuis to Euler, and then to Lagrange, indicating that Lagrange built upon Euler's work to develop analytical mechanics.
  • One participant points out that translating Maupertuis's action into energy results in an integral of 2T, which they argue is conceptually different from the action derived from the Lagrangian.
  • Questions are raised about whether Lagrange integrated the Lagrangian over time and if he or D'Alembert first discovered the concept of virtual work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the historical development and relationships between the concepts, with no consensus on whether Lagrange integrated the Lagrangian or who first introduced the concept of virtual work.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in historical understanding and the evolution of ideas, with participants acknowledging gaps in knowledge regarding the contributions of various figures in the development of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics.

alexepascual
Messages
371
Reaction score
1
I have seen that Lagrange's equations are some times derived from Hamilton's principle. This makes me wonder what the historical development of these ideas was. Hamilton lived in the nineteenth century while Lagrange lived in the eighteenth century.
The principle that minimizes the integral of the Lagrangian over time is called "Hamilton's principle", so I would assume that Lagrange had not thought about this. But he did have his "Lagrangian" (even if he didn't call it by that name). I would assume that Lagrange's equations were developed by Lagrange, and Lagrange's equations use the Lagrangian.
So, if Lagrange was using the Lagrangian, how come he didn't think of integrating the Lagrangian over time?.
Some place I read that the "Lagrangian approach" uses the integral of the viz viva (mv2) over time. This would be equivalent to the integral of p*ds (which is the Maupertuisian action).
So, this story sounds a little strange. Lagrange uses a principle of least action which uses mv2 as it's integrand instead of using the Lagrangian (which he invented). Then comes Hamilton who thinks up a new "least action principle" which uses the Lagrangian as argument.
Am I missing something here, or am I wrong about some of what I just said?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would *guess* that Lagrange got as far as Lagrange's equations, without realizing that his equations minimized a variational integral. But I don't know the actual history. One approach that leads to Lagrange's equations is the "virtual work" approach.
 
History of the Lagrangian:
Maupertuis proposed the forerunner of the principle of least action.
Daniel Bernoulli brought it to the attention of Euler.
Euler, fascinated with the mathematical problem, created the Calculus of Variations and derived the Euler equations form the minimized (actually stationized) action.
Lagrange used Euler's result, formed the general Lagrangean representation of the action and used this, plus his virtual work idea, to create the science of analytical mechanics in his Mechanique Analitique.

Hamilton's problem with Lagrange's method was that the Euler equations in it came out as second order differential equations. Hamilton sought for an approach that would yield first degree equations, and found it.
 
Thanks for your responses guys and sorry for the delay. I had forgotten to subscrive to this thread.
I still have some questions.
If you translate Maupertui's action S=integral{p ds} into energy, you get an integral of 2T over time, not the Lagrangian. So it looks like Maupertui's action is quite different conceptually form the Action you get from the Lagrangian.
From what I remember, the action obtained by integrating the Lagrangian is known as Hamiltonian Action, which would give the hint that Lagrange was not the one who came up with it.
My questions are:
(1) Did Lagrange at any point integrate the Lagrangian over time and talk about minimizing that or was Hamilton the first one to do it?
(2) Was Lagrange who discovered the concept of virtual work or was it D'alembert (or someone before him)?
Thanks again,
Alex
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K