Divisibility of 10 Digit Numbers: 1234567890

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ian Rumsey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the divisibility properties of 10-digit numbers, specifically focusing on the number 1234567890 and exploring arrangements of its digits that satisfy certain divisibility rules. Participants examine various configurations and their compliance with divisibility by integers from 1 to 10.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while the first digit is divisible by 1 and the first two digits by 2, the first four digits of 1234567890 are not divisible by 4, leading to a search for a valid arrangement.
  • Another participant suggests the number 9876543210 but points out that 9876543 is not divisible by 7, questioning its validity.
  • A different number, 3816547290, is proposed as a potential solution, with one participant claiming it is the unique correct answer.
  • Further analysis is provided by another participant who outlines a reasoning process involving the placement of digits based on divisibility rules for numbers 1 through 10, ultimately concluding that 3816547290 meets the criteria.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the best arrangement of digits that satisfies the divisibility requirements, although 3816547290 is frequently mentioned as a valid solution. Multiple competing views and numbers are presented without a definitive agreement on a single correct answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the divisibility of certain combinations and the implications of digit placement, indicating that assumptions about divisibility may depend on the specific arrangement of digits.

Ian Rumsey
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
1234567890
Reading from left to right, if you take the first digit of the above number it may be divided by one.
If you take the first two digits, '12' this number is divisible by two.
If you take the first three digits '123' this number is divisible by three.
However if you take the first four digits '1234' this number is not divisible by four.
If we transpose the 4 and 6 and make the number 1236547890 we may proceed.
We can now take the first four digits '1236' and this number may be divided by 4 and the first five digits 12365 may be divided by 5 and the first six digits 123654 divided by 6.
Unfortunately 1236547 cannot be divided by 7 nor can we change the 7 for a 3 as it has already been used and the digits 8, 9, 0, will not fit.
This particular series of numbers does not satisfy the divisional requirement.
The question is-
What would be the order of the digits which would satisfy the divisional requirement already shown and also allow the divisional progression to proceed for the remaining part of the 10 digit number.
Pocket calculators and slide-rules may be used.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
9876543210
 
keffi said:
9876543210

Sorry, but 9876543 is not divisible by 7.

What about 3816547290 and 9872541630 ?
 
3816547290

There is simple analytical (and quite a longish method) for this one ... luckily i had posted a solution to this one in another forum so was able to do the details pretty quickly.

-- AI
 
... 3816547290 is the right ( and unique ) answer!
 
Ian Rumsey said:
1234567890
Pocket calculators and slide-rules may be used.

Darn, now I really wish I would have checked this thread sooner. :cry:
 
Rogerio, could you please share your reasoning with us? Thank you.
 
recon said:
Rogerio, could you please share your reasoning with us? Thank you.

OK, let's go!
(I'm going to use the symbol '=' with the extra meaning 'belongs to')

The 10 digits number is divisible by 10 -> '0' is the last digit.

The 9 digits number is divisible by 9 -> as the first nine digits sum 45, don't care about the last digit.

The 5 digits number is divisible by 5 -> '0' is not available, so '5' is the last digit.

Our whole number is 'A B C D 5 E F G X 0' .
AB is divisible by 2 -> B is even
ABCD is divisible by 4 -> D is even , and so on.

B,D,E,G belong to [2,4,6,8]
A,C,F belong to [1,3,7,9]

C is odd and ABCD is div by 4 -> D = [2,6]
F is odd and ABCD5EFG is div by 8 -> G = [2,6]
So, D,G=[2,6] and B,E=[4,8]

ABC is div by 3, so A+B+C is div by 3
But ABCD5E is div by 6 and 3, too. So D+5+E is div by 3

Since ABC is div by 3, and B=[4,8]
if B=4 -> A,C=[1,7] So, E=8 and F=[3,9]. But D5E is div by 3 , and D=[2,6] , so D=2 . So G=6. But FG should be div by 8, so F=9 .
So, ABCD5EF = 1472589 or 7412589 which are not div by 7.
So B can't be '4' .
Then B=8 (and E=4).

E=4 and D5E is div by 3 -> D=6 . So G=2.


B=8 and ABC is div by 3 -> A,C=[1,3] or A,C=[7,9]

if A,C=[7,9] -> F=[1,3] but FG is div by 8 so F=3.
So ABCD5EF = 7896543 or 9876543 , which are not div by 7.

if A,C=[1,3] -> F=[7,9] but FG is div by 8 so F=7.
So ABCD5EF = 1836547 or 3816547 . And only 3816547 is div by 7.

So, the number is 3816547290 :-)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K