Question concerning rigid bodies

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jmc8197
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies Rigid bodies
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of rigid bodies as described in Landau's Mechanics, specifically equations (1) and (2) regarding the relationship between the velocities of particles within a rigid body. It establishes that if the velocity V and angular velocity W are perpendicular at a given origin O, they remain perpendicular at another origin O' after a transformation. The proof involves the dot product of W with the transformed velocities, demonstrating that the orthogonality condition is preserved. This conclusion is crucial for understanding the dynamics of rigid body motion in classical mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rigid body dynamics
  • Familiarity with vector operations, specifically cross products
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and its implications in physics
  • Basic grasp of coordinate transformations in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of angular velocity in rigid body motion
  • Learn about coordinate transformations in classical mechanics
  • Explore the concept of orthogonality in vector spaces
  • Investigate applications of Landau's Mechanics in real-world physics problems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying classical mechanics, particularly those focusing on the dynamics of rigid bodies and vector analysis.

jmc8197
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The following comes from Landau's Mechanics, pages 97 - 98.

For a particle in a rigid body, v = V + W x r -- (1)

where for some origin O of the moving body measured in the "fixed" system of
co-ordinates, v = particle's velocity in body in the "fixed" system, V = velocity of O in "fixed" system , W is the body's angular velocity in *fixed system", x is a cross product and r the particle's radial vector within body measured from O.

For another origin, O' distance a from O, r = r' + a, and substituting in
(1) gives:

v = V + W x a + W x r'. The definition of V' and W' shows that v = V' + W' x
r' and so

V' = V + W x a, W' = W -- (2)

He then says that the first part of (2) shows that if V and W are
perpendicular for a choice of origin O, then V' and W' are also
perpendicular for O'. Why?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you dot (*) equation (2a) with W, you get

W*V' = W*(V + W x a)=W*V +W*(Wxa) = W*V + 0 , since W is orthogonal to any vector crossed with W.

So, W*V' = W*V.

Since W'=W, by equation (2b), the left hand side is rewritten so that
W'*V' = W*V

So, if W*V=0, then W'*V'=0.

I think this is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K